Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill email-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/email-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/email-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/email-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/email-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/email-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00762 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00305 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00152 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00076 |
Grade A, and why
email-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to email-ops — 27 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Email Ops
Use this when the real task is mailbox work: triage, drafting, replying, sending, or proving a message landed in Sent.
This is not a generic writing skill. It is an operator workflow around the actual mail surface.
Skill Stack
Pull these ECC-native skills into the workflow when relevant:
brand-voicebefore drafting anything user-facinginvestor-outreachfor investor, partner, or sponsor-facing mailcustomer-billing-opswhen the thread is a billing/support incident rather than generic correspondenceknowledge-opswhen the message or thread should be captured into durable context afterwardresearch-opswhen a reply depends on fresh external facts
When to Use
- user asks to triage inbox or archive low-signal mail
- user wants a draft, reply, or new outbound email
- user wants to know whether a mail was already sent
- the user wants proof of which account, thread, or Sent entry was used
Guardrails
- draft first unless the user clearly asked for a live send
- never claim a message was sent without a real Sent-folder or client-side confirmation
- do not switch sender accounts casually; choose the account that matches the project and recipient
- do not delete uncertain business mail during cleanup
- if the task is really DM or iMessage work, hand off to
messages-ops
Workflow
1. Resolve the exact surface
Before acting, settle:
- which mailbox account
- which thread or recipient
- whether the task is triage, draft, reply, or send
- whether the user wants draft-only or live send
2. Read the thread before composing
If replying:
- read the existing thread
- identify the last outbound touch
- identify any commitments, deadlines, or unanswered questions
If creating a new outbound:
- identify warmth level
- select the correct channel and sender account
- pull
brand-voicebefore drafting
3. Draft, then verify
For draft-only work:
- produce the final copy
- state sender, recipient, subject, and purpose
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 0f48302235ff
email-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (91 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 762 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to email-ops, differing in 27 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ciel-antigravity-lookup
Find Antigravity conversations on macOS by UUID or keyword.
persistence
Continue working on a task until completion with automatic retry, self-verification, and alternative approaches. Activates "ralph mode" - never give up until the goal is achieved or explicitly impossible. Use when tasks require tenacity and iteration.
redteam
Expertise in offensive security research, vulnerability analysis, CMS-focused application testing, and red team operations.
redteam-cms
Focused methodology for authorized CMS fingerprinting, component inventory, misconfiguration review, and vulnerability validation.
redteam-exploit-validation
Focused workflow for validating exploitability safely and turning candidate issues into reproducible, bounded proof.
redteam-recon
Focused reconnaissance workflow for authorized security assessments, bug bounty triage, lab targets, and CTF infrastructure.