flutter-dart-code-review

flutter-dart-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from Jamkris/everything-gemini-code. It costs 56 tokens per session (5,259 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of flutter-dart-code-review, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing Flutter applications written in Dart. It covers widget structure, state management, Dart language mistakes, performance, accessibility, security, and application architecture.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Flutter projects, check widget and state-management practices, enforce Dart analysis rules, assess accessibility and security, and examine clean architecture.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers spot business logic in the user interface, unsafe or unclear Dart code, stale generated files, dependency problems, and maintainability issues.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review Flutter projects, check widget and state-management practices, enforce Dart analysis rules, assess accessibility and security, and examine clean architecture.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/flutter-dart-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill flutter-dart-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-code

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for flutter-dart-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/flutter-dart-code-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/flutter-dart-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/flutter-dart-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/flutter-dart-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 56 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,259 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 92% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00056 $0.05259
Opus 5 $0.00028 $0.02629
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.01052
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00526

Measured 3d ago against content hash 27b359d73337, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

flutter-dart-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

92% identical to flutter-dart-code-review — 41 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/flutter-dart-code-review/SKILL.md · 436 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 436 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Flutter/Dart Code Review Best Practices

Comprehensive, library-agnostic checklist for reviewing Flutter/Dart applications. These principles apply regardless of which state management solution, routing library, or DI framework is used.


1. General Project Health

  • Project follows consistent folder structure (feature-first or layer-first)
  • Proper separation of concerns: UI, business logic, data layers
  • No business logic in widgets; widgets are purely presentational
  • pubspec.yaml is clean — no unused dependencies, versions pinned appropriately
  • analysis_options.yaml includes a strict lint set with strict analyzer settings enabled
  • No print() statements in production code — use dart:developer log() or a logging package
  • Generated files (.g.dart, .freezed.dart, .gr.dart) are up-to-date or in .gitignore
  • Platform-specific code isolated behind abstractions

2. Dart Language Pitfalls

  • Implicit dynamic: Missing type annotations leading to dynamic — enable strict-casts, strict-inference, strict-raw-types
  • Null safety misuse: Excessive ! (bang operator) instead of proper null checks or Dart 3 pattern matching (if (value case var v?))
  • Type promotion failures: Using this.field where local variable promotion would work
  • Catching too broadly: catch (e) without on clause; always specify exception types
  • Catching Error: Error subtypes indicate bugs and should not be caught
  • Unused async: Functions marked async that never await — unnecessary overhead
  • late overuse: late used where nullable or constructor initialization would be safer; defers errors to runtime
  • String concatenation in loops: Use StringBuffer instead of + for iterative string building
  • Mutable state in const contexts: Fields in const constructor classes should not be mutable
  • Ignoring Future return values: Use await or explicitly call unawaited() to signal intent
  • var where final works: Prefer final for locals and const for compile-time constants
  • Relative imports: Use package: imports for consistency
  • Mutable collections exposed: Public APIs should return unmodifiable views, not raw List/Map
  • Missing Dart 3 pattern matching: Prefer switch expressions and if-case over verbose is checks and manual casting
  • Throwaway classes for multiple returns: Use Dart 3 records (String, int) instead of single-use DTOs
  • print() in production code: Use dart:developer log() or the project's logging package; print() has no log levels and cannot be filtered

Read the full file on GitHub · 436 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 436 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 27b359d73337

Subscribe to this mod's changes

flutter-dart-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (87 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 5,259 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to flutter-dart-code-review, differing in 41 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

codeck

Route explicit requests from a host coding agent to one or more locally configured AI executors through Codeck, attach Markdown or other project files, moderate cross-model consultation, expose disagreements, and synthesize traceable results. Use when the user explicitly names Codeck or asks to consult, compare, or…

isdou/codeck · 108 tokens

review-work

Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE after…

daeryundf2-prog/LAZYANTIGRAVITY · 116 tokens

code-review

Perform thorough code review and audit of implemented features. Compares implementation against the technical plan, checks for AI-specific risks, and provides actionable feedback. Activate for: review, audit, code quality assessment, security review.

richardcb/oh-my-gemini · 47 tokens

mobile-design

Mobile-first design thinking and decision-making for iOS and Android apps. Touch interaction, performance patterns, platform conventions. Teaches principles, not fixed values. Use when building React Native, Flutter, or native mobile apps.

trinhhaox/ag-kit · 47 tokens

mobile-games

Mobile game development principles. Touch input, battery, performance, app stores.

trinhhaox/ag-kit · 18 tokens

mobile-app-development

Group skill: Mobile app development — framework selection, design, state management, auth, backend, testing, deployment, and crash reporting.

may215/antigravity-awesome-group-skills · 31 tokens