Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill flutter-dart-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/flutter-dart-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/flutter-dart-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/flutter-dart-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.05259 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.02629 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01052 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00526 |
Grade A, and why
flutter-dart-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to flutter-dart-code-review — 41 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 436 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Flutter/Dart Code Review Best Practices
Comprehensive, library-agnostic checklist for reviewing Flutter/Dart applications. These principles apply regardless of which state management solution, routing library, or DI framework is used.
1. General Project Health
- Project follows consistent folder structure (feature-first or layer-first)
- Proper separation of concerns: UI, business logic, data layers
- No business logic in widgets; widgets are purely presentational
-
pubspec.yamlis clean — no unused dependencies, versions pinned appropriately -
analysis_options.yamlincludes a strict lint set with strict analyzer settings enabled - No
print()statements in production code — usedart:developerlog()or a logging package - Generated files (
.g.dart,.freezed.dart,.gr.dart) are up-to-date or in.gitignore - Platform-specific code isolated behind abstractions
2. Dart Language Pitfalls
- Implicit dynamic: Missing type annotations leading to
dynamic— enablestrict-casts,strict-inference,strict-raw-types - Null safety misuse: Excessive
!(bang operator) instead of proper null checks or Dart 3 pattern matching (if (value case var v?)) - Type promotion failures: Using
this.fieldwhere local variable promotion would work - Catching too broadly:
catch (e)withoutonclause; always specify exception types - Catching
Error:Errorsubtypes indicate bugs and should not be caught - Unused
async: Functions markedasyncthat neverawait— unnecessary overhead -
lateoveruse:lateused where nullable or constructor initialization would be safer; defers errors to runtime - String concatenation in loops: Use
StringBufferinstead of+for iterative string building - Mutable state in
constcontexts: Fields inconstconstructor classes should not be mutable - Ignoring
Futurereturn values: Useawaitor explicitly callunawaited()to signal intent -
varwherefinalworks: Preferfinalfor locals andconstfor compile-time constants - Relative imports: Use
package:imports for consistency - Mutable collections exposed: Public APIs should return unmodifiable views, not raw
List/Map - Missing Dart 3 pattern matching: Prefer switch expressions and
if-caseover verboseischecks and manual casting - Throwaway classes for multiple returns: Use Dart 3 records
(String, int)instead of single-use DTOs -
print()in production code: Usedart:developerlog()or the project's logging package;print()has no log levels and cannot be filtered
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 436 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 27b359d73337
flutter-dart-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (87 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 5,259 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to flutter-dart-code-review, differing in 41 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
codeck
Route explicit requests from a host coding agent to one or more locally configured AI executors through Codeck, attach Markdown or other project files, moderate cross-model consultation, expose disagreements, and synthesize traceable results. Use when the user explicitly names Codeck or asks to consult, compare, or…
review-work
Post-implementation review orchestrator. Launches 5 parallel background sub-agents: Oracle (goal/constraint verification), Oracle (code quality), Oracle (security), unspecified-high (hands-on QA execution), unspecified-high (context mining from GitHub/git/Slack/Notion). All must pass for review to pass. MUST USE after…
code-review
Perform thorough code review and audit of implemented features. Compares implementation against the technical plan, checks for AI-specific risks, and provides actionable feedback. Activate for: review, audit, code quality assessment, security review.
mobile-design
Mobile-first design thinking and decision-making for iOS and Android apps. Touch interaction, performance patterns, platform conventions. Teaches principles, not fixed values. Use when building React Native, Flutter, or native mobile apps.
mobile-games
Mobile game development principles. Touch input, battery, performance, app stores.
mobile-app-development
Group skill: Mobile app development — framework selection, design, state management, auth, backend, testing, deployment, and crash reporting.