Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jamkris/everything-gemini-code --skill product-capabilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jamkris/everything-gemini-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/product-capability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/product-capability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/product-capability/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/product-capability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jamkris/everything-gemini-code/product-capability.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00906 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00362 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
product-capability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
98% identical to product-capability — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Product Capability
This skill turns product intent into explicit engineering constraints.
Use it when the gap is not "what should we build?" but "what exactly must be true before implementation starts?"
When to Use
- A PRD, roadmap item, discussion, or founder note exists, but the implementation constraints are still implicit
- A feature crosses multiple services, repos, or teams and needs a capability contract before coding
- Product intent is clear, but architecture, data, lifecycle, or policy implications are still fuzzy
- Senior engineers keep restating the same hidden assumptions during review
- You need a reusable artifact that can survive across harnesses and sessions
Canonical Artifact
If the repo has a durable product-context file such as PRODUCT.md, docs/product/, or a program-spec directory, update it there.
If no capability manifest exists yet, create one using the template at:
docs/examples/product-capability-template.md
The goal is not to create another planning stack. The goal is to make hidden capability constraints durable and reusable.
Non-Negotiable Rules
- Do not invent product truth. Mark unresolved questions explicitly.
- Separate user-visible promises from implementation details.
- Call out what is fixed policy, what is architecture preference, and what is still open.
- If the request conflicts with existing repo constraints, say so clearly instead of smoothing it over.
- Prefer one reusable capability artifact over scattered ad hoc notes.
Inputs
Read only what is needed:
- Product intent
- issue, discussion, PRD, roadmap note, founder message
- Current architecture
- relevant repo docs, contracts, schemas, routes, existing workflows
- Existing capability context
PRODUCT.md, design docs, RFCs, migration notes, operating-model docs
- Delivery constraints
- auth, billing, compliance, rollout, backwards compatibility, performance, review policy
Core Workflow
1. Restate the capability
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 142 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 668f14c37bf8
product-capability is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jamkris/everything-gemini-code (91 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 906 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to product-capability, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
beads
Git-backed issue tracker for multi-session work with dependencies and persistent memory across conversation compaction. Use when work spans sessions, has blockers, or needs context recovery after compaction.
track-creation
Create new Conductor tracks with spec, plan, and metadata files. Bundles all templates needed for track creation. Use when starting a new feature track via /omg:track or when manually creating tracks.
projectflow-execute
Execute, resume, inspect, skip, or redo ProjectFlow DAG projects through the projectflow MCP server. Use when the user supplies a ProjectFlow JSON graph, asks to run work by dependency order, wants cross-session progress recovery, or requests ProjectFlow status changes.
redteam
Expertise in offensive security research, vulnerability analysis, CMS-focused application testing, and red team operations.
redteam-source-audit
Focused source-code security review workflow for web applications, CMS extensions, APIs, and supporting services.
redteam-cms
Focused methodology for authorized CMS fingerprinting, component inventory, misconfiguration review, and vulnerability validation.