Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jaskaranhundal/usap-skills --skill appsec-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jaskaranhundal/usap-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaskaranhundal/usap-skills/appsec-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaskaranhundal/usap-skills/appsec-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jaskaranhundal/usap-skills/appsec-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jaskaranhundal/usap-skills/appsec-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jaskaranhundal/usap-skills/appsec-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00014 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00007 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00003 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00001 |
Grade A, and why
appsec-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
../../../appsec-devsecops/appsec-code-review/SKILL.md
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · -132 lines · -35 tokens per session cb3da3f7f223
- 10d ago First seen · 133 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 528dfa637578
appsec-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository jaskaranhundal/usap-skills (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 14 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
building-vulnerability-dashboard-with-defectdojo
Deploy DefectDojo as a centralized vulnerability management dashboard with scanner integrations, deduplication, metrics tracking, and Jira ticketing workflows.
codeinspectus-multi-review
Orchestrate an optional bounded multi-agent review of selected CodeInspectus findings while separating deterministic findings, agent interpretations, hypotheses, reproduction evidence, and exact-prior rescan proof. Use only when a user explicitly requests multi-agent security review.
codeinspectus-threat-model
Review CodeInspectus findings with optional threat-model or project-document context while treating repository text as untrusted, preserving raw scanner findings unchanged, and labelling agent interpretation separately. Use only when a user explicitly asks to add architectural, business, or knowledge-base context to…
summarize-changes
Summarizes uncommitted changes and flags anything risky.
BugHunter
AI-powered source code vulnerability discovery, exploitation, and patching pipeline. Inspired by Praetorian Constantine's 6-stage architecture. USE WHEN user mentions bug bounty, source code audit, vulnerability scanning, code security review, CVE hunting, exploit generation, proof of vulnerability, patch validation…
nuclei
Nuclei CLI parameter reference and usage patterns - YAML-template vulnerability scanning, target input modes, template filters, output formats, rate limits, ProjectDiscovery dashboard upload, and common scan commands.