Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add JasonxzWen/harness-hub --skill tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JasonxzWen/harness-hubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jasonxzwen/harness-hub/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jasonxzwen/harness-hub/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jasonxzwen/harness-hub/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jasonxzwen/harness-hub/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jasonxzwen/harness-hub/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00651 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00326 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00130 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 79 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 2ba87d1a213c
tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository JasonxzWen/harness-hub (72 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 651 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-implementer-sparc-coder
Agent skill for implementer-sparc-coder - invoke with $agent-implementer-sparc-coder.
agent-tdd-london-swarm
Agent skill for tdd-london-swarm - invoke with $agent-tdd-london-swarm.
moai-workflow-tdd
Test-Driven Development workflow specialist using RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle for test-first software development. Use when developing new features from scratch or when behavior specification drives implementation.
behavior-contract
Bug condition/postcondition formalization as testable Behavior Contracts. Defines invariants that must be preserved across fixes.
tdd-enforcement
Red-Green-Refactor TDD methodology with mandatory failing tests, minimal implementation, quality refactoring, and 80% coverage gating.
orchestrated-execution
Execute work units through the rigorous 4-phase Metaswarm cycle (Implement -> Validate -> Adversarial Review -> Commit) with independent quality gate enforcement.