responsible-ai-assessment

responsible-ai-assessment is a skill for Claude Code from jassics/awesome-claude-security. It costs 77 tokens per session (497 once invoked), scanned A, original, GPL-3.0.

A review method for checking an AI system or program against responsible-AI and governance frameworks, such as the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, ISO/IEC 42001, EU AI Act, and OECD principles.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for AI governance reviews, audit preparation, responsible-AI assessments, and planning improvements to oversight and monitoring.
Why use it?
Teams may have gaps in oversight, transparency, documentation, accountability, or monitoring without a structured review. This identifies those gaps and turns them into a prioritized improvement plan.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the ai-safety plugin — 6 skills, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it for AI governance reviews, audit preparation, responsible-AI assessments, and planning improvements to oversight and monitoring.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jassics/awesome-claude-security/responsible-ai-assessment
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jassics/awesome-claude-security --skill responsible-ai-assessment
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jassics/awesome-claude-security

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ai-safety, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 6 skills, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for responsible-ai-assessment

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jassics/awesome-claude-security/responsible-ai-assessment/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jassics/awesome-claude-security/responsible-ai-assessment)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jassics/awesome-claude-security/responsible-ai-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jassics/awesome-claude-security/responsible-ai-assessment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for responsible-ai-assessment

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jassics/awesome-claude-security/responsible-ai-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jassics/awesome-claude-security/responsible-ai-assessment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 77 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 497 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00077 $0.00497
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.00249
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00099
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00050

Measured 11d ago against content hash b155d8ab5aac, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

responsible-ai-assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/ai-safety/skills/responsible-ai-assessment/SKILL.md · 47 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed GPL-3.0

The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 47 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A b155d8ab5aac

Subscribe to this mod's changes

responsible-ai-assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository jassics/awesome-claude-security (6 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 497 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

incorporation

A guide for moving from working as an individual business owner to operating through a company in Japan. It covers company types, setup steps, officer pay, taxes, and social insurance.

kazukinagata/shinkoku · 127 tokens

revenue-recognition

Determines when and how revenue is recognized — performance obligations, contract terms that change the answer, and the deal structures that create accounting problems. Use this to work out how a contract should be recognized, review a non-standard deal before it is signed, understand deferred revenue, or spot terms…

cbrock84/headcount · 69 tokens

contract-review

Reviews and negotiates commercial agreements — MSAs, SOWs, order forms, NDAs, vendor and data-processing agreements — identifying material risk, proposing positions, and recommending a path rather than listing issues. Use this to review a contract before signature, prepare a negotiation position, build fallback…

cbrock84/headcount · 74 tokens

privacy-and-data-protection

Assesses and improves how personal data is collected, used, shared, and retained — data mapping, lawful basis, consent, processor agreements, subject rights, and breach obligations. Use this before launching anything that handles personal data, when adding a vendor that will process it, when a data subject request…

cbrock84/headcount · 86 tokens

benefits-and-leave

Designs and runs employee benefits and leave — health and retirement plans, leave policy, cost and renewal, and the administration that keeps them compliant. Use this to design or review a benefits package, prepare for a renewal, write leave policy, handle a leave request, or decide what benefits are worth their cost.

cbrock84/headcount · 68 tokens

compensation-and-leveling

Builds and maintains the leveling framework and pay structure — level definitions, salary bands, benchmarking, pay equity, and how raises and promotions are decided. Use this to design or revise leveling, set or adjust salary bands, benchmark against market, handle a compensation request or counteroffer, run a review…

cbrock84/headcount · 75 tokens