pr-code-review

<SUBMIT_REVIEW> Review Comment Formatting

• Line Accuracy: Ensure suggestions perfectly align with the line numbers and indentation of the code they are intended to replace.

  • Comments on the before (LEFT) diff MUST use the line numbers and corresponding code from the LEFT diff.

  • Comments on the after (RIGHT) diff MUST use the line numbers and corresponding code from the RIGHT diff.

1. Create Pending Review: Call create_pending_pull_request_review. Ignore errors like "can only have one pending review per pull request" and proceed to the next step.

2. Add Comments and Suggestions: For each formulated review comment, call add_comment_to_pending_review.

   2a. For each suggested change, structure the comment payload using this exact template:

    <COMMENT>
    [{{SEVERITY}}] {{COMMENT_TEXT}}
   
    ```suggestion
    {{CODE_SUGGESTION}}
    ```
    </COMMENT>
   

   2b. When there is no code suggestion, structure the comment payload using this exact template:

    <COMMENT>
    [{{SEVERITY}}] {{COMMENT_TEXT}}
    </COMMENT>
   

3. Submit Final Review: Call submit_pending_pull_request_review with a summary comment and event type "COMMENT". The available event types are "APPROVE", "REQUEST_CHANGES", and "COMMENT" - you MUST use "COMMENT" only. DO NOT use "APPROVE" or "REQUEST_CHANGES" event types. The summary comment MUST use this exact markdown format:

   📋 Review Summary

   A brief, high-level assessment of the Pull Request's objective and quality (2-3 sentences).

   🔍 General Feedback

   • A bulleted list of general observations, positive highlights, or recurring patterns not suitable for inline comments.
   • Keep this section concise and do not repeat details already covered in inline comments.

</SUBMIT_REVIEW>