What is code-review-and-quality?

A code-review process that checks changes across relevant quality areas and selects review rules based on the parts of the project they affect.

Use it when reviewing code from yourself, another agent, or a teammate, before merging changes.

It gives reviews a consistent policy and helps catch issues before code is merged.

code-review-and-quality — Skill for Claude Code and Codex by jcarlosro

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit --skill code-review-and-quality

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/code-review-and-quality.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/code-review-and-quality)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/code-review-and-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/code-review-and-quality.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Per session 51 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 794 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits

NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026

How audits are shown

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00051	$0.00794
Opus 5	$0.00026	$0.00397
Sonnet 5	$0.00010	$0.00159
Haiku 4.5	$0.00005	$0.00079

Measured 7d ago against content hash 3963ac8ff7f6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review-and-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

opencode/skills/code-review-and-quality/SKILL.md · 108 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review And Quality

Purpose

Route every code review through one canonical policy and only the profiles that match the changed surface and declared architecture. This file is an entrypoint, not a second source of review rules.

Required Loading Sequence

Read references/review-policy.md completely.
Always activate the core policy.
Activate the generic backend and/or frontend profile from the changed surface.
Activate a strict architecture profile only from an explicit declaration in the task, applicable repository instructions, an ADR, a specification, or architecture documentation.
Treat file names and folders only as corroborating evidence; layout alone does not activate a strict profile.
Report profile_resolution: selected profiles, omitted profiles, evidence for selection, and fallback used when architecture is not declared.
Apply the findings and final-output contracts from the canonical policy.

Profile Routing

Generic backend

Read references/profiles/backend.md for server, worker, consumer, persistence, backend API, or server-side integration changes.

Declared Clean/DDD/hexagonal/CQRS backend

Read references/profiles/backend-clean-ddd-cqrs.md only for the parts of Clean Architecture, DDD, hexagonal architecture, or CQRS that the repository or task explicitly declares.

Generic frontend

Read references/profiles/frontend.md for web, mobile, desktop, UI, client state, navigation, local storage, or client network changes.

Declared Clean/layered frontend

Read references/profiles/frontend-clean-layered.md only when a layered/Clean client architecture is explicitly declared.

Contextual Adaptation

When no strict profile is declared:

preserve correctness, dependency direction, boundary clarity, testability, replaceability, and explicit contracts;
translate those principles into the project's actual modules, services, stores, hooks, components, controllers, adapters, or other boundaries;
follow applicable local instructions, ADRs, and canonical examples;
do not require DDD building blocks, Clean layers, CQRS, repositories, value objects, use-case classes, or specific folder/naming conventions;
do not treat personal preference as architecture evidence.

Read the full file on GitHub · 108 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

7d ago First seen · 108 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 3963ac8ff7f6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review-and-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit (108 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 794 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Code review agent-harness agent-orchestration-as-code agentic-workflows ai-coding-agents developer-workflows opencode

ahk-review

Preview a code review against ticket/objective alignment, with deep semantic (name-vs-behavior) analysis. No tasks created, no harness tracking.

enmanuelmag/agent-harness-kit · 35 tokens

plannotator

Reference for using the Plannotator CLI: plan review, code review, annotating files, URLs, folders, and running local apps, annotating the last assistant message, browsing archived plan decisions, and exporting or sharing Guided Reviews. Invoke when asked to use Plannotator for anything not covered by a more specific…

backnotprop/plannotator · 73 tokens

review-work

Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.

code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent · 63 tokens

code-review-and-quality