Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit --skill iterative-retrievalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/iterative-retrieval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/iterative-retrieval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/iterative-retrieval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/iterative-retrieval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit/iterative-retrieval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01642 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00657 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00164 |
Grade A, and why
iterative-retrieval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 233 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Iterative Retrieval Pattern
Solves the "context problem" in multi-agent workflows where subagents don't know what context they need until they start working.
When to Use
- Spawning subagents that need codebase context they cannot predict upfront
- Building multi-agent workflows where context is progressively refined
- Encountering "context too large" or "missing context" failures in agent tasks
- Designing RAG-like retrieval pipelines for code exploration
- Optimizing token usage in agent orchestration
The Problem
Subagents are spawned with limited context. They don't know:
- Which files contain relevant code
- What patterns exist in the codebase
- What terminology the project uses
Standard approaches fail:
- Send everything: Exceeds context limits
- Send nothing: Agent lacks critical information
- Guess what's needed: Often wrong
The Solution: Iterative Retrieval
A 4-phase loop that progressively refines context:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ DISPATCH │─────│ EVALUATE │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ ▲ │ │
│ │ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ LOOP │─────│ REFINE │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ │
│ Max 3 cycles, then proceed │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Phase 1: DISPATCH
Initial broad query to gather candidate files:
// Start with high-level intent
const initialQuery = {
patterns: ['src/**/*.ts', 'lib/**/*.ts'],
keywords: ['authentication', 'user', 'session'],
excludes: ['*.test.ts', '*.spec.ts']
};
// Dispatch to retrieval agent
const candidates = await retrieveFiles(initialQuery);
Phase 2: EVALUATE
Assess retrieved content for relevance:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 233 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 1b8bd15b4512
iterative-retrieval is a skill published in the GitHub repository jcarlosrodicio/opencode-agent-orchestration-kit (133 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,642 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa
Run scalable, isolated live QA for nac development. The top-level local orchestrator must parse n (default 4), dispatch one setup worker with this skill, copy its n assignment contracts verbatim into exactly n parallel test workers with this skill, then dispatch one aggregate worker with this skill using all test…
release
Cut and publish a full stable NAC release after main, release-PR, and publication CI pass. Use when a maintainer asks for a stable version bump, tag, or GitHub Release. Never use for release candidates; NAC RC releases are automated.
triage
Triage a GitHub repository's open issues by finding exact duplicates, rejecting evidenceably off-base requests, requesting concrete clarification, applying only existing labels, and opening a linked root-cause issue when multiple reports share one underlying invariant failure. Use when a maintainer asks to triage…
ahk-test
Design, write, and run behavior-focused tests for an objective or existing code. Writes test files only and reports evidence. No tasks created, no harness tracking.
ahk-review
Preview a code review against ticket/objective alignment, with deep semantic (name-vs-behavior) analysis. No tasks created, no harness tracking.
ahk-consultant
Get technical advice or review on an approach, idea, or change. References available skills for best practices. No tasks created, no harness tracking.