Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jd-opensource/joysafeter/executing-plansnpx skills add jd-opensource/JoySafeter --skill executing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jd-opensource/JoySafeterWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00558 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
executing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to Executing Plans — 20 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Executing Plans
Overview
Load plan, review critically, execute tasks in batches, report for review between batches.
Core principle: Batch execution with checkpoints for architect review.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
The Process
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
- Read plan file
- Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
- If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
- If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
Step 2: Execute Batch
Default: First 3 tasks
For each task:
- Mark as in_progress
- Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
- Run verifications as specified
- Mark as completed
Step 3: Report
When batch complete:
- Show what was implemented
- Show verification output
- Say: "Ready for feedback."
Step 4: Continue
Based on feedback:
- Apply changes if needed
- Execute next batch
- Repeat until complete
Step 5: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
When to Stop and Ask for Help
STOP executing immediately when:
- Hit a blocker mid-batch (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)
- Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
- You don't understand an instruction
- Verification fails repeatedly
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
When to Revisit Earlier Steps
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
- Partner updates the plan based on your feedback
- Fundamental approach needs rethinking
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Remember
- Review plan critically first
- Follow plan steps exactly
- Don't skip verifications
- Reference skills when plan says to
- Between batches: just report and wait
- Stop when blocked, don't guess
- Never start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 85 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A d099fa42fd75
executing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository jd-opensource/JoySafeter (305 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 558 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to Executing Plans, differing in 20 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarmclaw
AI agent runtime and multi-agent orchestration platform. Teaches agents how to use SwarmClaw's 6 primitive tools, persistent memory, dreaming, delegation, connectors, credentials, and the skill system. Use when an agent is running on SwarmClaw and needs to understand the platform's capabilities.
nemoclaw-maintainer-validate-launchable
Validate the user-facing staging Brev Launchable deployment, NemoClaw image and runtime identity, onboarding, CLI behavior, and inference. Use when a maintainer asks to test the staging Launchable in the Brev web interface, provides a deployed Brev environment URL, hands a Launchable instance to Codex, or needs…
nemoclaw-maintainer-find-review-pr
Find open PRs with the security label and Urgent or High Project Priority. Link each PR to its issue. Identify competing or superseded PRs and report review candidates. Use when looking for the next PR to review. Trigger keywords - find pr, find review, next pr, pr to review, duplicate pr, security pr.
nemoclaw-maintainer-verify-stale
Verifies whether stale NVIDIA/NemoClaw bug reports still reproduce on the newest release tag. Use when maintainers ask to verify stale issues, reproduce old bugs on the newest release tag, or drain the bug backlog. Treats issue reproducers as untrusted, validates them on the reported release before a fixed verdict…
nemoclaw-maintainer-cross-issue-sweep
Scan open issues to find issues that a PR can also fix or conflict with. Report each relationship with file and line evidence. Use this skill during PR review to find related fixes and risks.
nemoclaw-maintainer-triage
Triage NemoClaw issues and PRs with Issue Type, Project fields, and allowed labels. Support one item or a batch. Show proposed changes and apply only changes the maintainer accepts. Trigger keywords - triage, label issues, suggest labels, batch triage, triage issue, triage PR, label this, what labels.