Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill data-quality-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-quality-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-quality-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-quality-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-quality-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-quality-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.04506 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.02253 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00901 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00451 |
Grade A, and why
data-quality-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to data-quality-check — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 584 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Quality Check for Construction
Overview
Based on DDC methodology (Chapter 2.6), this skill provides comprehensive data quality assessment for construction projects. Poor data quality leads to poor decisions - validate early, validate often.
Book Reference: "Требования к качеству данных и его обеспечение" / "Data Quality Requirements"
"Качество данных определяется пятью ключевыми метриками: полнота, точность, согласованность, своевременность и достоверность." — DDC Book, Chapter 2.6
Quick Start
import pandas as pd
# Load construction data
df = pd.read_excel("bim_export.xlsx")
# Quick quality check
quality_score = {
'completeness': (1 - df.isnull().sum().sum() / df.size) * 100,
'unique_ids': df['ElementId'].nunique() == len(df),
'valid_volumes': (df['Volume_m3'] >= 0).all()
}
print(f"Completeness: {quality_score['completeness']:.1f}%")
print(f"Unique IDs: {quality_score['unique_ids']}")
print(f"Valid volumes: {quality_score['valid_volumes']}")
Data Quality Dimensions
The 5 Quality Metrics
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import re
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
class DataQualityChecker:
"""Comprehensive data quality assessment for construction data"""
def __init__(self, df):
self.df = df.copy()
self.results = {}
self.issues = []
def check_completeness(self, required_columns=None):
"""Check for missing values (Полнота)"""
if required_columns is None:
required_columns = self.df.columns.tolist()
completeness = {}
for col in required_columns:
if col in self.df.columns:
non_null = self.df[col].notna().sum()
total = len(self.df)
completeness[col] = (non_null / total) * 100
else:
completeness[col] = 0
self.issues.append(f"Missing required column: {col}")
overall = np.mean(list(completeness.values()))
self.results['completeness'] = {
'by_column': completeness,
'overall': overall,
'threshold': 95,
'passed': overall >= 95
}
return self.results['completeness']
def check_accuracy(self, rules=None):
"""Check data accuracy against rules (Точность)"""
if rules is None:
# Default construction data rules
rules = {
'Volume_m3': {'min': 0, 'max': 10000},
'Area_m2': {'min': 0, 'max': 100000},
'Weight_kg': {'min': 0, 'max': 1000000},
'Cost': {'min': 0, 'max': 100000000}
}
accuracy = {}
for col, bounds in rules.items():
if col in self.df.columns:
valid = self.df[col].between(
bounds.get('min', -np.inf),
bounds.get('max', np.inf)
).sum()
total = self.df[col].notna().sum()
accuracy[col] = (valid / total * 100) if total > 0 else 100
# Log invalid values
invalid_count = total - valid
if invalid_count > 0:
self.issues.append(
f"{col}: {invalid_count} values outside range [{bounds.get('min')}, {bounds.get('max')}]"
)
overall = np.mean(list(accuracy.values())) if accuracy else 100
self.results['accuracy'] = {
'by_column': accuracy,
'overall': overall,
'threshold': 98,
'passed': overall >= 98
}
return self.results['accuracy']
def check_consistency(self, unique_cols=None, relationship_rules=None):
"""Check data consistency (Согласованность)"""
consistency = {}
# Check unique columns
if unique_cols is None:
unique_cols = ['ElementId']
for col in unique_cols:
if col in self.df.columns:
is_unique = self.df[col].nunique() == len(self.df)
consistency[f'{col}_unique'] = 100 if is_unique else \
(self.df[col].nunique() / len(self.df) * 100)
if not is_unique:
duplicates = self.df[self.df[col].duplicated()][col].unique()
self.issues.append(f"Duplicate {col}: {len(duplicates)} duplicates found")
# Check cross-field relationships
if relationship_rules is None:
relationship_rules = [
('End_Date', '>=', 'Start_Date'),
('Gross_Volume', '>=', 'Net_Volume')
]
for col1, op, col2 in relationship_rules:
if col1 in self.df.columns and col2 in self.df.columns:
if op == '>=':
valid = (self.df[col1] >= self.df[col2]).sum()
elif op == '>':
valid = (self.df[col1] > self.df[col2]).sum()
elif op == '==':
valid = (self.df[col1] == self.df[col2]).sum()
total = self.df[[col1, col2]].notna().all(axis=1).sum()
consistency[f'{col1}_{op}_{col2}'] = (valid / total * 100) if total > 0 else 100
overall = np.mean(list(consistency.values())) if consistency else 100
self.results['consistency'] = {
'checks': consistency,
'overall': overall,
'threshold': 99,
'passed': overall >= 99
}
return self.results['consistency']
def check_timeliness(self, date_col='Modified_Date', max_age_days=30):
"""Check data timeliness (Своевременность)"""
if date_col not in self.df.columns:
self.results['timeliness'] = {
'overall': None,
'message': f'Column {date_col} not found'
}
return self.results['timeliness']
dates = pd.to_datetime(self.df[date_col], errors='coerce')
cutoff = datetime.now() - timedelta(days=max_age_days)
recent = (dates >= cutoff).sum()
total = dates.notna().sum()
timeliness_pct = (recent / total * 100) if total > 0 else 0
oldest = dates.min()
newest = dates.max()
avg_age = (datetime.now() - dates.mean()).days if dates.notna().any() else None
self.results['timeliness'] = {
'recent_percentage': timeliness_pct,
'oldest_record': oldest,
'newest_record': newest,
'average_age_days': avg_age,
'threshold': 80,
'passed': timeliness_pct >= 80
}
return self.results['timeliness']
def check_validity(self, patterns=None):
"""Check data validity with regex patterns (Достоверность)"""
if patterns is None:
patterns = {
'ElementId': r'^[A-Z]{1,3}\d{3,6}$', # e.g., W001, FL12345
'Level': r'^Level\s*\d+$|^L\d+$|^Уровень\s*\d+$',
'Email': r'^[\w\.-]+@[\w\.-]+\.\w+$',
'Phone': r'^\+?\d{10,15}$'
}
validity = {}
for col, pattern in patterns.items():
if col in self.df.columns:
non_null = self.df[col].dropna()
if len(non_null) > 0:
matches = non_null.astype(str).str.match(pattern).sum()
validity[col] = (matches / len(non_null) * 100)
invalid = len(non_null) - matches
if invalid > 0:
self.issues.append(f"{col}: {invalid} values don't match pattern")
else:
validity[col] = 100
overall = np.mean(list(validity.values())) if validity else 100
self.results['validity'] = {
'by_column': validity,
'overall': overall,
'threshold': 95,
'passed': overall >= 95
}
return self.results['validity']
def run_full_check(self):
"""Run all quality checks"""
self.check_completeness()
self.check_accuracy()
self.check_consistency()
self.check_timeliness()
self.check_validity()
# Calculate overall score
scores = []
for metric in ['completeness', 'accuracy', 'consistency', 'validity']:
if metric in self.results and self.results[metric].get('overall'):
scores.append(self.results[metric]['overall'])
self.results['overall_score'] = np.mean(scores) if scores else 0
self.results['grade'] = self._calculate_grade(self.results['overall_score'])
self.results['issues'] = self.issues
return self.results
def _calculate_grade(self, score):
"""Calculate quality grade"""
if score >= 98:
return 'A+'
elif score >= 95:
return 'A'
elif score >= 90:
return 'B'
elif score >= 80:
return 'C'
elif score >= 70:
return 'D'
else:
return 'F'
def generate_report(self):
"""Generate quality report"""
if not self.results:
self.run_full_check()
report = []
report.append("=" * 60)
report.append("DATA QUALITY REPORT")
report.append("=" * 60)
report.append(f"Records analyzed: {len(self.df)}")
report.append(f"Columns: {len(self.df.columns)}")
report.append("")
report.append(f"OVERALL SCORE: {self.results['overall_score']:.1f}% (Grade: {self.results['grade']})")
report.append("")
report.append("-" * 60)
# Detail by dimension
for metric in ['completeness', 'accuracy', 'consistency', 'validity', 'timeliness']:
if metric in self.results:
r = self.results[metric]
passed = '✓' if r.get('passed', False) else '✗'
overall = r.get('overall', r.get('recent_percentage', 'N/A'))
if isinstance(overall, (int, float)):
report.append(f"{metric.upper():15s}: {overall:>6.1f}% {passed}")
else:
report.append(f"{metric.upper():15s}: {overall}")
report.append("-" * 60)
if self.issues:
report.append("")
report.append("ISSUES FOUND:")
for issue in self.issues[:10]: # Show first 10
report.append(f" • {issue}")
if len(self.issues) > 10:
report.append(f" ... and {len(self.issues) - 10} more issues")
report.append("")
report.append("=" * 60)
return "\n".join(report)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 584 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 1cb8d1916fe9
data-quality-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 4,506 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to data-quality-check, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…