Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill data-source-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-source-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-source-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-source-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-source-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/data-source-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.04250 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.02125 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00850 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00425 |
Grade A, and why
data-source-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to data-source-audit — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 549 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Source Audit for Construction
Overview
Perform comprehensive audits of construction data sources to identify silos, map data flows, assess quality, and plan integration strategies. Essential for digital transformation and data-driven construction initiatives.
Business Case
Construction organizations typically have 10-50+ data sources:
- Project management systems
- Estimating software
- Scheduling tools
- Accounting/ERP systems
- BIM platforms
- Document management systems
- Field apps
- Spreadsheets
Note: This skill is vendor-agnostic and works with any data source. Product names mentioned elsewhere in examples are trademarks of their respective owners.
This skill helps:
- Discover all data sources
- Map data flows and dependencies
- Identify integration opportunities
- Prioritize data improvement efforts
Technical Implementation
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import List, Dict, Any, Optional, Set
from enum import Enum
from datetime import datetime
import pandas as pd
import json
class DataSourceType(Enum):
DATABASE = "database"
API = "api"
FILE_SHARE = "file_share"
CLOUD_APP = "cloud_app"
SPREADSHEET = "spreadsheet"
LEGACY_SYSTEM = "legacy_system"
IOT_SENSOR = "iot_sensor"
MANUAL_ENTRY = "manual_entry"
class DataDomain(Enum):
COST = "cost"
SCHEDULE = "schedule"
BIM = "bim"
DOCUMENT = "document"
FIELD = "field"
SAFETY = "safety"
QUALITY = "quality"
HR = "hr"
ACCOUNTING = "accounting"
PROCUREMENT = "procurement"
@dataclass
class DataSource:
name: str
source_type: DataSourceType
domains: List[DataDomain]
owner: str
department: str
description: str
# Technical details
technology: str
location: str # cloud, on-prem, hybrid
access_method: str # API, ODBC, file export, manual
# Data characteristics
update_frequency: str # real-time, daily, weekly, monthly, ad-hoc
data_volume: str # small, medium, large
retention_period: str
# Quality metrics
completeness_score: float = 0.0
accuracy_score: float = 0.0
timeliness_score: float = 0.0
# Integration status
integrations: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
is_master: bool = False # Is this the master source for any entity?
master_for: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
# Issues
known_issues: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
# Metadata
last_audit_date: Optional[datetime] = None
audit_notes: str = ""
@dataclass
class DataFlow:
source: str
target: str
flow_type: str # push, pull, bidirectional, manual
frequency: str
entities: List[str] # What data entities flow
transformation: str # none, simple, complex
status: str # active, planned, deprecated
@dataclass
class DataSilo:
name: str
sources: List[str]
impact: str # high, medium, low
description: str
resolution_options: List[str]
class DataSourceAuditor:
"""Audit and analyze construction data sources."""
def __init__(self):
self.sources: Dict[str, DataSource] = {}
self.flows: List[DataFlow] = []
self.silos: List[DataSilo] = []
def add_source(self, source: DataSource):
"""Register a data source."""
self.sources[source.name] = source
def add_flow(self, flow: DataFlow):
"""Register a data flow between sources."""
self.flows.append(flow)
def discover_sources_from_survey(self, survey_responses: List[Dict]) -> List[DataSource]:
"""Create data sources from survey responses."""
sources = []
for response in survey_responses:
source = DataSource(
name=response['system_name'],
source_type=DataSourceType(response['type']),
domains=[DataDomain(d) for d in response['domains']],
owner=response['owner'],
department=response['department'],
description=response['description'],
technology=response['technology'],
location=response['location'],
access_method=response['access_method'],
update_frequency=response['update_frequency'],
data_volume=response['data_volume'],
retention_period=response['retention_period'],
)
sources.append(source)
self.add_source(source)
return sources
def identify_silos(self) -> List[DataSilo]:
"""Identify data silos based on integration analysis."""
silos = []
# Find sources with no integrations
isolated_sources = [
name for name, source in self.sources.items()
if not source.integrations and source.source_type != DataSourceType.MANUAL_ENTRY
]
if isolated_sources:
silos.append(DataSilo(
name="Isolated Systems",
sources=isolated_sources,
impact="high",
description="Systems with no integrations, requiring manual data transfer",
resolution_options=[
"Implement API integration",
"Set up automated file exports",
"Migrate to integrated platform"
]
))
# Find duplicate data domains without master
domain_sources: Dict[DataDomain, List[str]] = {}
for name, source in self.sources.items():
for domain in source.domains:
if domain not in domain_sources:
domain_sources[domain] = []
domain_sources[domain].append(name)
for domain, sources in domain_sources.items():
if len(sources) > 1:
# Check if any is designated master
masters = [s for s in sources if self.sources[s].is_master]
if not masters:
silos.append(DataSilo(
name=f"No Master for {domain.value}",
sources=sources,
impact="medium",
description=f"Multiple sources for {domain.value} data without designated master",
resolution_options=[
"Designate master data source",
"Implement MDM solution",
"Create data reconciliation process"
]
))
# Find one-way flows that should be bidirectional
flow_pairs = {}
for flow in self.flows:
key = tuple(sorted([flow.source, flow.target]))
if key not in flow_pairs:
flow_pairs[key] = []
flow_pairs[key].append(flow)
for (s1, s2), flows in flow_pairs.items():
if len(flows) == 1 and flows[0].flow_type != 'bidirectional':
# Check if bidirectional would make sense
s1_domains = set(self.sources[s1].domains)
s2_domains = set(self.sources[s2].domains)
if s1_domains & s2_domains: # Overlapping domains
silos.append(DataSilo(
name=f"One-way flow: {s1} -> {s2}",
sources=[s1, s2],
impact="low",
description="Data flows one direction only between systems with overlapping domains",
resolution_options=[
"Evaluate need for bidirectional sync",
"Implement change data capture"
]
))
self.silos = silos
return silos
def assess_source_quality(self, source_name: str, sample_data: pd.DataFrame) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""Assess data quality for a source based on sample data."""
if source_name not in self.sources:
raise ValueError(f"Unknown source: {source_name}")
scores = {}
# Completeness: % of non-null values
completeness = 1 - (sample_data.isnull().sum().sum() / sample_data.size)
scores['completeness'] = completeness
# Uniqueness: % of unique rows (for key columns)
if len(sample_data) > 0:
uniqueness = len(sample_data.drop_duplicates()) / len(sample_data)
else:
uniqueness = 1.0
scores['uniqueness'] = uniqueness
# Validity: Basic format checks (simplified)
validity_checks = 0
total_checks = 0
for col in sample_data.columns:
if 'date' in col.lower():
total_checks += 1
try:
pd.to_datetime(sample_data[col], errors='raise')
validity_checks += 1
except:
pass
if 'email' in col.lower():
total_checks += 1
valid_emails = sample_data[col].str.contains(r'@.*\.', na=False).sum()
if valid_emails / len(sample_data) > 0.9:
validity_checks += 1
scores['validity'] = validity_checks / total_checks if total_checks > 0 else 1.0
# Update source with scores
self.sources[source_name].completeness_score = scores['completeness']
self.sources[source_name].accuracy_score = scores['validity']
return scores
def create_data_catalog(self) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Create a data catalog from all sources."""
catalog_entries = []
for name, source in self.sources.items():
entry = {
'Source Name': name,
'Type': source.source_type.value,
'Domains': ', '.join(d.value for d in source.domains),
'Owner': source.owner,
'Department': source.department,
'Technology': source.technology,
'Location': source.location,
'Access Method': source.access_method,
'Update Frequency': source.update_frequency,
'Data Volume': source.data_volume,
'Integrations': len(source.integrations),
'Is Master': 'Yes' if source.is_master else 'No',
'Quality Score': (source.completeness_score + source.accuracy_score) / 2,
'Known Issues': len(source.known_issues),
}
catalog_entries.append(entry)
return pd.DataFrame(catalog_entries)
def generate_integration_matrix(self) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Generate integration matrix showing connections between sources."""
source_names = list(self.sources.keys())
matrix = pd.DataFrame(
index=source_names,
columns=source_names,
data=''
)
for flow in self.flows:
if flow.source in source_names and flow.target in source_names:
current = matrix.loc[flow.source, flow.target]
symbol = '→' if flow.flow_type == 'push' else '←' if flow.flow_type == 'pull' else '↔'
matrix.loc[flow.source, flow.target] = f"{current}{symbol}" if current else symbol
return matrix
def calculate_integration_score(self) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""Calculate overall integration score and breakdown."""
if not self.sources:
return {'overall': 0.0}
scores = {}
# Coverage: % of sources with at least one integration
integrated = sum(1 for s in self.sources.values() if s.integrations)
scores['coverage'] = integrated / len(self.sources)
# Master data: % of domains with designated master
domains_with_master = set()
for source in self.sources.values():
if source.is_master:
domains_with_master.update(source.master_for)
all_domains = set()
for source in self.sources.values():
all_domains.update(d.value for d in source.domains)
scores['master_data'] = len(domains_with_master) / len(all_domains) if all_domains else 1.0
# Data quality average
quality_scores = [
(s.completeness_score + s.accuracy_score) / 2
for s in self.sources.values()
if s.completeness_score > 0 or s.accuracy_score > 0
]
scores['quality'] = sum(quality_scores) / len(quality_scores) if quality_scores else 0.0
# Silo impact
high_impact_silos = sum(1 for s in self.silos if s.impact == 'high')
scores['silo_risk'] = 1 - (high_impact_silos * 0.2) # Each high-impact silo reduces score
# Overall
scores['overall'] = (
scores['coverage'] * 0.3 +
scores['master_data'] * 0.25 +
scores['quality'] * 0.25 +
scores['silo_risk'] * 0.2
)
return scores
def generate_audit_report(self) -> str:
"""Generate comprehensive audit report."""
report = ["# Data Source Audit Report", ""]
report.append(f"**Audit Date:** {datetime.now().strftime('%Y-%m-%d')}")
report.append(f"**Total Sources:** {len(self.sources)}")
report.append(f"**Total Data Flows:** {len(self.flows)}")
report.append("")
# Integration Score
scores = self.calculate_integration_score()
report.append("## Integration Maturity Score")
report.append(f"**Overall Score:** {scores['overall']:.1%}")
report.append(f"- Coverage: {scores['coverage']:.1%}")
report.append(f"- Master Data: {scores['master_data']:.1%}")
report.append(f"- Data Quality: {scores['quality']:.1%}")
report.append(f"- Silo Risk: {scores['silo_risk']:.1%}")
report.append("")
# Sources by Type
report.append("## Sources by Type")
by_type = {}
for source in self.sources.values():
t = source.source_type.value
by_type[t] = by_type.get(t, 0) + 1
for t, count in sorted(by_type.items(), key=lambda x: -x[1]):
report.append(f"- {t}: {count}")
report.append("")
# Data Silos
report.append("## Identified Data Silos")
if self.silos:
for silo in self.silos:
report.append(f"\n### {silo.name}")
report.append(f"**Impact:** {silo.impact}")
report.append(f"**Sources:** {', '.join(silo.sources)}")
report.append(f"**Description:** {silo.description}")
report.append("**Resolution Options:**")
for opt in silo.resolution_options:
report.append(f"- {opt}")
else:
report.append("No significant data silos identified.")
report.append("")
# Recommendations
report.append("## Recommendations")
recommendations = self._generate_recommendations()
for i, rec in enumerate(recommendations, 1):
report.append(f"{i}. {rec}")
return "\n".join(report)
def _generate_recommendations(self) -> List[str]:
"""Generate recommendations based on audit findings."""
recommendations = []
scores = self.calculate_integration_score()
if scores['coverage'] < 0.7:
recommendations.append(
"Increase integration coverage - over 30% of systems are isolated. "
"Prioritize connecting high-value data sources."
)
if scores['master_data'] < 0.5:
recommendations.append(
"Implement Master Data Management - designate authoritative sources "
"for key entities (projects, vendors, employees, cost codes)."
)
if scores['quality'] < 0.7:
recommendations.append(
"Improve data quality - implement validation rules at data entry points "
"and automated quality monitoring."
)
# Check for spreadsheet dependency
spreadsheets = [s for s in self.sources.values()
if s.source_type == DataSourceType.SPREADSHEET]
if len(spreadsheets) > 3:
recommendations.append(
f"Reduce spreadsheet dependency - {len(spreadsheets)} spreadsheet-based "
"data sources identified. Migrate critical data to proper databases."
)
# Check for legacy systems
legacy = [s for s in self.sources.values()
if s.source_type == DataSourceType.LEGACY_SYSTEM]
if legacy:
recommendations.append(
f"Plan legacy system migration - {len(legacy)} legacy systems identified. "
"Create modernization roadmap."
)
return recommendations
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 549 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A d30f63557a85
data-source-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 4,250 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to data-source-audit, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…