Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill ontology-mappergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/ontology-mapper)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/ontology-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/ontology-mapper/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/ontology-mapper"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/ontology-mapper.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.04872 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.02436 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00974 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00487 |
Grade A, and why
ontology-mapper scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to ontology-mapper — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 569 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ontology Mapper
Overview
Based on DDC methodology (Chapter 2.2), this skill maps construction data to standard ontologies like IFC, COBie, Uniclass, and OmniClass, enabling semantic interoperability between systems.
Book Reference: "Доминирование открытых данных" / "Open Data Dominance"
Quick Start
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from enum import Enum
from typing import List, Dict, Optional, Set, Tuple
from datetime import datetime
import json
import re
class OntologyType(Enum):
"""Standard construction ontologies"""
IFC = "ifc" # Industry Foundation Classes
COBIE = "cobie" # Construction Operations Building Information Exchange
UNICLASS = "uniclass" # UK classification
OMNICLASS = "omniclass" # North American classification
MASTERFORMAT = "masterformat" # CSI MasterFormat
UNIFORMAT = "uniformat" # CSI UniFormat
CUSTOM = "custom" # Custom ontology
class MappingConfidence(Enum):
"""Confidence level of mapping"""
EXACT = "exact" # 100% match
HIGH = "high" # 90%+ match
MEDIUM = "medium" # 70-90% match
LOW = "low" # 50-70% match
UNCERTAIN = "uncertain" # <50% match
class RelationType(Enum):
"""Types of relationships between concepts"""
EQUIVALENT = "equivalent" # Same concept
BROADER = "broader" # Source is more specific
NARROWER = "narrower" # Source is more general
RELATED = "related" # Related but not equivalent
PART_OF = "part_of" # Component relationship
HAS_PART = "has_part" # Contains components
@dataclass
class OntologyConcept:
"""Concept in an ontology"""
id: str
name: str
ontology: OntologyType
definition: Optional[str] = None
parent_id: Optional[str] = None
synonyms: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)
properties: Dict[str, str] = field(default_factory=dict)
@dataclass
class SemanticMapping:
"""Mapping between two concepts"""
source_concept: str
source_ontology: OntologyType
target_concept: str
target_ontology: OntologyType
relation: RelationType
confidence: MappingConfidence
notes: Optional[str] = None
created_by: str = "auto"
created_at: datetime = field(default_factory=datetime.now)
@dataclass
class MappingResult:
"""Result of ontology mapping operation"""
source_field: str
source_value: str
mappings: List[SemanticMapping]
best_match: Optional[SemanticMapping] = None
unmapped: bool = False
@dataclass
class OntologyMappingReport:
"""Complete mapping report"""
total_fields: int
mapped_fields: int
unmapped_fields: int
mappings: List[MappingResult]
coverage: float
confidence_distribution: Dict[str, int]
recommendations: List[str]
class OntologyMapper:
"""
Map construction data to standard ontologies.
Based on DDC methodology Chapter 2.2.
"""
def __init__(self):
self.ontologies = self._load_ontologies()
self.mapping_rules = self._load_mapping_rules()
self.synonym_map = self._build_synonym_map()
def _load_ontologies(self) -> Dict[OntologyType, Dict[str, OntologyConcept]]:
"""Load standard construction ontologies"""
ontologies = {}
# IFC Schema (simplified)
ontologies[OntologyType.IFC] = {
"IfcWall": OntologyConcept("IfcWall", "Wall", OntologyType.IFC,
"A vertical construction that bounds or subdivides spaces"),
"IfcSlab": OntologyConcept("IfcSlab", "Slab", OntologyType.IFC,
"A horizontal planar building element"),
"IfcBeam": OntologyConcept("IfcBeam", "Beam", OntologyType.IFC,
"A horizontal structural member"),
"IfcColumn": OntologyConcept("IfcColumn", "Column", OntologyType.IFC,
"A vertical structural member"),
"IfcDoor": OntologyConcept("IfcDoor", "Door", OntologyType.IFC,
"A building element for access"),
"IfcWindow": OntologyConcept("IfcWindow", "Window", OntologyType.IFC,
"A building element for light and ventilation"),
"IfcRoof": OntologyConcept("IfcRoof", "Roof", OntologyType.IFC,
"A building element covering a building"),
"IfcStair": OntologyConcept("IfcStair", "Stair", OntologyType.IFC,
"A vertical circulation element"),
"IfcSpace": OntologyConcept("IfcSpace", "Space", OntologyType.IFC,
"A defined volume of air"),
"IfcBuildingStorey": OntologyConcept("IfcBuildingStorey", "Building Storey",
OntologyType.IFC, "A horizontal aggregation of spaces"),
}
# COBie (simplified)
ontologies[OntologyType.COBIE] = {
"Floor": OntologyConcept("Floor", "Floor", OntologyType.COBIE,
"A floor or level in a building"),
"Space": OntologyConcept("Space", "Space", OntologyType.COBIE,
"A spatial region"),
"Type": OntologyConcept("Type", "Type", OntologyType.COBIE,
"A product type or specification"),
"Component": OntologyConcept("Component", "Component", OntologyType.COBIE,
"An individual product instance"),
"Zone": OntologyConcept("Zone", "Zone", OntologyType.COBIE,
"A spatial grouping of spaces"),
"System": OntologyConcept("System", "System", OntologyType.COBIE,
"A building system or network"),
}
# Uniclass (simplified)
ontologies[OntologyType.UNICLASS] = {
"Ss_25": OntologyConcept("Ss_25", "Wall Systems", OntologyType.UNICLASS),
"Ss_30": OntologyConcept("Ss_30", "Roof Systems", OntologyType.UNICLASS),
"Ss_32": OntologyConcept("Ss_32", "Floor Systems", OntologyType.UNICLASS),
"Ss_35": OntologyConcept("Ss_35", "Stair Systems", OntologyType.UNICLASS),
"Pr_20": OntologyConcept("Pr_20", "Structural Products", OntologyType.UNICLASS),
"Pr_30": OntologyConcept("Pr_30", "Wall Products", OntologyType.UNICLASS),
"Pr_35": OntologyConcept("Pr_35", "Door Products", OntologyType.UNICLASS),
"Pr_40": OntologyConcept("Pr_40", "Window Products", OntologyType.UNICLASS),
}
# MasterFormat (simplified)
ontologies[OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT] = {
"03": OntologyConcept("03", "Concrete", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
"04": OntologyConcept("04", "Masonry", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
"05": OntologyConcept("05", "Metals", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
"06": OntologyConcept("06", "Wood and Plastics", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
"07": OntologyConcept("07", "Thermal and Moisture Protection", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
"08": OntologyConcept("08", "Doors and Windows", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
"09": OntologyConcept("09", "Finishes", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
"22": OntologyConcept("22", "Plumbing", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
"23": OntologyConcept("23", "HVAC", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
"26": OntologyConcept("26", "Electrical", OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT),
}
return ontologies
def _load_mapping_rules(self) -> List[SemanticMapping]:
"""Load predefined mapping rules between ontologies"""
rules = [
# IFC to COBie
SemanticMapping("IfcBuildingStorey", OntologyType.IFC, "Floor",
OntologyType.COBIE, RelationType.EQUIVALENT, MappingConfidence.EXACT),
SemanticMapping("IfcSpace", OntologyType.IFC, "Space",
OntologyType.COBIE, RelationType.EQUIVALENT, MappingConfidence.EXACT),
# IFC to Uniclass
SemanticMapping("IfcWall", OntologyType.IFC, "Ss_25",
OntologyType.UNICLASS, RelationType.RELATED, MappingConfidence.HIGH),
SemanticMapping("IfcRoof", OntologyType.IFC, "Ss_30",
OntologyType.UNICLASS, RelationType.RELATED, MappingConfidence.HIGH),
SemanticMapping("IfcSlab", OntologyType.IFC, "Ss_32",
OntologyType.UNICLASS, RelationType.RELATED, MappingConfidence.HIGH),
SemanticMapping("IfcDoor", OntologyType.IFC, "Pr_35",
OntologyType.UNICLASS, RelationType.RELATED, MappingConfidence.HIGH),
SemanticMapping("IfcWindow", OntologyType.IFC, "Pr_40",
OntologyType.UNICLASS, RelationType.RELATED, MappingConfidence.HIGH),
# IFC to MasterFormat
SemanticMapping("IfcDoor", OntologyType.IFC, "08",
OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT, RelationType.BROADER, MappingConfidence.MEDIUM),
SemanticMapping("IfcWindow", OntologyType.IFC, "08",
OntologyType.MASTERFORMAT, RelationType.BROADER, MappingConfidence.MEDIUM),
]
return rules
def _build_synonym_map(self) -> Dict[str, List[str]]:
"""Build synonym mappings for fuzzy matching"""
return {
"wall": ["partition", "barrier", "divider"],
"door": ["entrance", "portal", "opening"],
"window": ["glazing", "fenestration", "opening"],
"floor": ["slab", "deck", "storey", "level"],
"roof": ["roofing", "covering", "canopy"],
"beam": ["girder", "joist", "lintel"],
"column": ["pillar", "post", "pier"],
"stair": ["stairway", "staircase", "steps"],
"space": ["room", "area", "zone"],
"concrete": ["cement", "reinforced"],
"steel": ["metal", "iron"],
}
def map_field(
self,
field_name: str,
field_value: str,
source_ontology: Optional[OntologyType] = None,
target_ontology: OntologyType = OntologyType.IFC
) -> MappingResult:
"""
Map a single field to target ontology.
Args:
field_name: Name of the field
field_value: Value to map
source_ontology: Source ontology if known
target_ontology: Target ontology to map to
Returns:
Mapping result with possible matches
"""
mappings = []
# Normalize the value
normalized = self._normalize_value(field_value)
# Check direct matches in existing rules
for rule in self.mapping_rules:
if rule.target_ontology == target_ontology:
if self._matches(normalized, rule.source_concept):
mappings.append(rule)
# Check target ontology directly
target_concepts = self.ontologies.get(target_ontology, {})
for concept_id, concept in target_concepts.items():
similarity = self._calculate_similarity(normalized, concept)
if similarity > 0.5:
confidence = self._similarity_to_confidence(similarity)
mappings.append(SemanticMapping(
source_concept=field_value,
source_ontology=source_ontology or OntologyType.CUSTOM,
target_concept=concept_id,
target_ontology=target_ontology,
relation=RelationType.EQUIVALENT if similarity > 0.9 else RelationType.RELATED,
confidence=confidence
))
# Sort by confidence
confidence_order = [
MappingConfidence.EXACT,
MappingConfidence.HIGH,
MappingConfidence.MEDIUM,
MappingConfidence.LOW,
MappingConfidence.UNCERTAIN
]
mappings.sort(key=lambda m: confidence_order.index(m.confidence))
return MappingResult(
source_field=field_name,
source_value=field_value,
mappings=mappings,
best_match=mappings[0] if mappings else None,
unmapped=len(mappings) == 0
)
def _normalize_value(self, value: str) -> str:
"""Normalize a value for matching"""
# Remove common prefixes
prefixes = ["ifc", "cobie", "type", "element"]
normalized = value.lower().strip()
for prefix in prefixes:
if normalized.startswith(prefix):
normalized = normalized[len(prefix):]
return normalized.strip("_- ")
def _matches(self, value: str, concept: str) -> bool:
"""Check if value matches concept"""
normalized_value = self._normalize_value(value)
normalized_concept = self._normalize_value(concept)
return normalized_value == normalized_concept
def _calculate_similarity(
self,
value: str,
concept: OntologyConcept
) -> float:
"""Calculate similarity between value and concept"""
value_lower = value.lower()
concept_name_lower = concept.name.lower()
concept_id_lower = concept.id.lower()
# Exact match
if value_lower == concept_name_lower or value_lower == concept_id_lower:
return 1.0
# Partial match in name
if value_lower in concept_name_lower or concept_name_lower in value_lower:
return 0.8
# Check synonyms
for key, synonyms in self.synonym_map.items():
if key in value_lower:
if key in concept_name_lower:
return 0.9
for syn in synonyms:
if syn in concept_name_lower:
return 0.7
# Definition match
if concept.definition:
if value_lower in concept.definition.lower():
return 0.6
return 0.0
def _similarity_to_confidence(self, similarity: float) -> MappingConfidence:
"""Convert similarity score to confidence level"""
if similarity >= 0.95:
return MappingConfidence.EXACT
elif similarity >= 0.8:
return MappingConfidence.HIGH
elif similarity >= 0.6:
return MappingConfidence.MEDIUM
elif similarity >= 0.4:
return MappingConfidence.LOW
else:
return MappingConfidence.UNCERTAIN
def map_schema(
self,
schema: Dict[str, List[str]],
target_ontology: OntologyType = OntologyType.IFC
) -> OntologyMappingReport:
"""
Map entire schema to target ontology.
Args:
schema: Dictionary of field names to sample values
target_ontology: Target ontology
Returns:
Complete mapping report
"""
all_mappings = []
confidence_dist = {c.value: 0 for c in MappingConfidence}
for field_name, sample_values in schema.items():
# Use first sample value
value = sample_values[0] if sample_values else field_name
result = self.map_field(field_name, value, target_ontology=target_ontology)
all_mappings.append(result)
if result.best_match:
confidence_dist[result.best_match.confidence.value] += 1
mapped = sum(1 for m in all_mappings if not m.unmapped)
unmapped = len(all_mappings) - mapped
coverage = mapped / len(all_mappings) if all_mappings else 0
recommendations = self._generate_recommendations(all_mappings, coverage)
return OntologyMappingReport(
total_fields=len(all_mappings),
mapped_fields=mapped,
unmapped_fields=unmapped,
mappings=all_mappings,
coverage=coverage,
confidence_distribution=confidence_dist,
recommendations=recommendations
)
def _generate_recommendations(
self,
mappings: List[MappingResult],
coverage: float
) -> List[str]:
"""Generate recommendations for improving mappings"""
recommendations = []
if coverage < 0.7:
recommendations.append(
f"Low mapping coverage ({coverage:.0%}). Consider adding custom mappings."
)
low_confidence = [m for m in mappings
if m.best_match and m.best_match.confidence
in [MappingConfidence.LOW, MappingConfidence.UNCERTAIN]]
if low_confidence:
recommendations.append(
f"{len(low_confidence)} mappings have low confidence. Review manually."
)
unmapped = [m for m in mappings if m.unmapped]
if unmapped:
fields = [m.source_field for m in unmapped[:5]]
recommendations.append(
f"Unmapped fields: {', '.join(fields)}. Add custom mappings."
)
return recommendations
def create_mapping(
self,
source: str,
source_ontology: OntologyType,
target: str,
target_ontology: OntologyType,
relation: RelationType = RelationType.EQUIVALENT,
notes: Optional[str] = None
) -> SemanticMapping:
"""Create a new manual mapping"""
mapping = SemanticMapping(
source_concept=source,
source_ontology=source_ontology,
target_concept=target,
target_ontology=target_ontology,
relation=relation,
confidence=MappingConfidence.EXACT,
notes=notes,
created_by="manual"
)
self.mapping_rules.append(mapping)
return mapping
def export_mappings(self, format: str = "json") -> str:
"""Export all mappings"""
if format == "json":
mappings_data = []
for rule in self.mapping_rules:
mappings_data.append({
"source": rule.source_concept,
"source_ontology": rule.source_ontology.value,
"target": rule.target_concept,
"target_ontology": rule.target_ontology.value,
"relation": rule.relation.value,
"confidence": rule.confidence.value
})
return json.dumps(mappings_data, indent=2)
else:
raise ValueError(f"Unsupported format: {format}")
def generate_report(self, report: OntologyMappingReport) -> str:
"""Generate mapping report"""
output = f"""
# Ontology Mapping Report
## Summary
- **Total Fields:** {report.total_fields}
- **Mapped Fields:** {report.mapped_fields}
- **Unmapped Fields:** {report.unmapped_fields}
- **Coverage:** {report.coverage:.0%}
## Confidence Distribution
"""
for conf, count in report.confidence_distribution.items():
if count > 0:
output += f"- **{conf.title()}:** {count}\n"
output += "\n## Recommendations\n"
for rec in report.recommendations:
output += f"- {rec}\n"
output += "\n## Mappings\n"
for mapping in report.mappings[:20]:
status = "✓" if not mapping.unmapped else "✗"
target = mapping.best_match.target_concept if mapping.best_match else "unmapped"
conf = mapping.best_match.confidence.value if mapping.best_match else "-"
output += f"- {status} {mapping.source_field}: {mapping.source_value} → {target} ({conf})\n"
return output
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 569 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 5fbf6234096e
ontology-mapper is a skill published in the GitHub repository jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 4,872 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to ontology-mapper, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-rag-engine-management
Manage and query Agent Platform RAG Engine Corpora and retrieve grounded contexts using the Google GenAI SDK. Use when listing RAG corpora or files, inspecting a corpus, retrieving contexts, or generating content grounded in a RAG corpus. Do not use for standard database queries (use SQL/Spanner skills), Google…
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and generates guidance to design and deploy a governed, secure agentic-analytics solution for data that's distributed across Google Cloud, other cloud providers, or on-premises. Data that's outside Google Cloud (such as data from Databricks, Snowflake, Salesforce, SAP, or Oracle systems) is…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.