Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill productivity-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_ConstructionWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.02797 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01399 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00559 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00280 |
Grade A, and why
productivity-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to productivity-analyzer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 381 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Productivity Analyzer
Business Case
Problem Statement
Understanding productivity requires:
- Tracking actual output rates
- Comparing to planned rates
- Identifying problem areas
- Forecasting project completion
Solution
Analyze labor productivity data to identify trends, compare to benchmarks, and provide actionable insights.
Technical Implementation
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
from datetime import date, timedelta
from enum import Enum
class ProductivityStatus(Enum):
EXCELLENT = "excellent" # >110% of planned
ON_TARGET = "on_target" # 90-110%
BELOW = "below" # 70-90%
CRITICAL = "critical" # <70%
@dataclass
class ProductivityRecord:
date: date
activity_code: str
description: str
planned_output: float
actual_output: float
unit: str
manhours: float
crew_size: int
conditions: str # weather, access issues
@dataclass
class ProductivityAnalysis:
activity_code: str
description: str
total_planned: float
total_actual: float
total_manhours: float
planned_rate: float # unit per manhour
actual_rate: float
efficiency: float # percentage
status: ProductivityStatus
trend: str # improving, declining, stable
class ProductivityAnalyzer:
"""Analyze construction productivity data."""
# Industry benchmark rates (unit per manhour)
BENCHMARKS = {
'concrete_pour': 0.5, # m3/MH
'rebar_install': 15, # kg/MH
'formwork': 0.8, # m2/MH
'brick_laying': 35, # bricks/MH
'drywall': 1.5, # m2/MH
'painting': 3.0, # m2/MH
'conduit': 8, # m/MH
'pipe': 3, # m/MH
'excavation': 2.5, # m3/MH
'backfill': 3.0, # m3/MH
}
def __init__(self):
self.records: List[ProductivityRecord] = []
def add_record(self,
date: date,
activity_code: str,
description: str,
planned_output: float,
actual_output: float,
unit: str,
manhours: float,
crew_size: int,
conditions: str = "normal"):
"""Add productivity record."""
self.records.append(ProductivityRecord(
date=date,
activity_code=activity_code,
description=description,
planned_output=planned_output,
actual_output=actual_output,
unit=unit,
manhours=manhours,
crew_size=crew_size,
conditions=conditions
))
def import_from_dataframe(self, df: pd.DataFrame):
"""Import records from DataFrame."""
for _, row in df.iterrows():
self.add_record(
date=pd.to_datetime(row['date']).date(),
activity_code=row['activity_code'],
description=row.get('description', ''),
planned_output=float(row['planned_output']),
actual_output=float(row['actual_output']),
unit=row.get('unit', 'unit'),
manhours=float(row['manhours']),
crew_size=int(row.get('crew_size', 1)),
conditions=row.get('conditions', 'normal')
)
def _get_status(self, efficiency: float) -> ProductivityStatus:
"""Determine productivity status."""
if efficiency >= 110:
return ProductivityStatus.EXCELLENT
elif efficiency >= 90:
return ProductivityStatus.ON_TARGET
elif efficiency >= 70:
return ProductivityStatus.BELOW
else:
return ProductivityStatus.CRITICAL
def _calculate_trend(self, records: List[ProductivityRecord]) -> str:
"""Calculate productivity trend."""
if len(records) < 3:
return "insufficient_data"
# Sort by date
sorted_records = sorted(records, key=lambda x: x.date)
# Calculate efficiency for first and last third
n = len(sorted_records)
third = n // 3
early_efficiency = []
late_efficiency = []
for i, r in enumerate(sorted_records):
if r.manhours > 0:
eff = (r.actual_output / r.planned_output * 100) if r.planned_output > 0 else 0
if i < third:
early_efficiency.append(eff)
elif i >= n - third:
late_efficiency.append(eff)
if not early_efficiency or not late_efficiency:
return "stable"
early_avg = np.mean(early_efficiency)
late_avg = np.mean(late_efficiency)
if late_avg > early_avg * 1.05:
return "improving"
elif late_avg < early_avg * 0.95:
return "declining"
else:
return "stable"
def analyze_activity(self, activity_code: str) -> Optional[ProductivityAnalysis]:
"""Analyze productivity for specific activity."""
activity_records = [r for r in self.records if r.activity_code == activity_code]
if not activity_records:
return None
total_planned = sum(r.planned_output for r in activity_records)
total_actual = sum(r.actual_output for r in activity_records)
total_manhours = sum(r.manhours for r in activity_records)
planned_rate = total_planned / total_manhours if total_manhours > 0 else 0
actual_rate = total_actual / total_manhours if total_manhours > 0 else 0
efficiency = (total_actual / total_planned * 100) if total_planned > 0 else 0
return ProductivityAnalysis(
activity_code=activity_code,
description=activity_records[0].description,
total_planned=round(total_planned, 2),
total_actual=round(total_actual, 2),
total_manhours=round(total_manhours, 1),
planned_rate=round(planned_rate, 3),
actual_rate=round(actual_rate, 3),
efficiency=round(efficiency, 1),
status=self._get_status(efficiency),
trend=self._calculate_trend(activity_records)
)
def analyze_all_activities(self) -> List[ProductivityAnalysis]:
"""Analyze all activities."""
activities = set(r.activity_code for r in self.records)
return [self.analyze_activity(code) for code in activities if self.analyze_activity(code)]
def compare_to_benchmark(self, activity_code: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Compare activity to industry benchmark."""
analysis = self.analyze_activity(activity_code)
if not analysis:
return {}
# Find matching benchmark
benchmark = None
for key, value in self.BENCHMARKS.items():
if key in activity_code.lower():
benchmark = value
break
if benchmark is None:
return {
'activity': activity_code,
'actual_rate': analysis.actual_rate,
'benchmark': 'Not available',
'vs_benchmark': 'N/A'
}
vs_benchmark = (analysis.actual_rate / benchmark * 100) if benchmark > 0 else 0
return {
'activity': activity_code,
'actual_rate': analysis.actual_rate,
'benchmark_rate': benchmark,
'vs_benchmark_pct': round(vs_benchmark, 1),
'recommendation': 'Above benchmark' if vs_benchmark >= 100 else 'Below benchmark - investigate'
}
def identify_problem_areas(self) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
"""Identify activities with productivity issues."""
problems = []
for analysis in self.analyze_all_activities():
if analysis.status in [ProductivityStatus.BELOW, ProductivityStatus.CRITICAL]:
problems.append({
'activity': analysis.activity_code,
'efficiency': analysis.efficiency,
'status': analysis.status.value,
'trend': analysis.trend,
'manhours_impacted': analysis.total_manhours,
'priority': 'HIGH' if analysis.status == ProductivityStatus.CRITICAL else 'MEDIUM'
})
return sorted(problems, key=lambda x: x['efficiency'])
def forecast_completion(self,
activity_code: str,
remaining_quantity: float) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Forecast completion based on current productivity."""
analysis = self.analyze_activity(activity_code)
if not analysis or analysis.actual_rate == 0:
return {}
# Manhours needed at current rate
manhours_needed = remaining_quantity / analysis.actual_rate
# Average daily manhours
activity_records = [r for r in self.records if r.activity_code == activity_code]
avg_daily_mh = np.mean([r.manhours for r in activity_records]) if activity_records else 8
days_needed = manhours_needed / avg_daily_mh if avg_daily_mh > 0 else 0
return {
'activity': activity_code,
'remaining_qty': remaining_quantity,
'current_rate': analysis.actual_rate,
'manhours_needed': round(manhours_needed, 1),
'days_needed': round(days_needed, 1),
'estimated_completion': date.today() + timedelta(days=int(days_needed))
}
def export_analysis(self, output_path: str) -> str:
"""Export analysis to Excel."""
with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
# Summary
analyses = self.analyze_all_activities()
summary_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Activity': a.activity_code,
'Description': a.description,
'Planned': a.total_planned,
'Actual': a.total_actual,
'Manhours': a.total_manhours,
'Efficiency %': a.efficiency,
'Status': a.status.value,
'Trend': a.trend
}
for a in analyses
])
summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)
# Problems
problems = self.identify_problem_areas()
if problems:
problems_df = pd.DataFrame(problems)
problems_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Problem Areas', index=False)
# Raw data
records_df = pd.DataFrame([
{
'Date': r.date,
'Activity': r.activity_code,
'Planned': r.planned_output,
'Actual': r.actual_output,
'Unit': r.unit,
'Manhours': r.manhours,
'Crew': r.crew_size,
'Conditions': r.conditions
}
for r in self.records
])
records_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Raw Data', index=False)
return output_path
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 381 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A f149e3b5f1c7
productivity-analyzer is a skill published in the GitHub repository jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 2,797 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to productivity-analyzer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…