productivity-analyzer

productivity-analyzer is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction. It costs 25 tokens per session (2,797 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of productivity-analyzer, MIT.

A labor-productivity analysis tool that compares planned work with actual output, finds trends, and checks results against industry benchmarks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review output rates, find problem areas, compare performance with benchmarks, and assess likely completion dates.
Why use it?
It helps reveal where work is falling behind plan and supports earlier project-completion forecasts.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Which agent this was written for is unclear — built for openclaw. Also seen: built for openclaw.

Good fit Use it to review output rates, find problem areas, compare performance with benchmarks, and assess likely completion dates.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction --skill productivity-analyzer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for productivity-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for productivity-analyzer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jdmorag97-rgb/ddc_skills_for_ai_agents_in_construction/productivity-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 25 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,797 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00025 $0.02797
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.01399
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00559
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00280

Measured 12d ago against content hash f149e3b5f1c7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

productivity-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to productivity-analyzer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

1_DDC_Toolkit/Analytics/productivity-analyzer/SKILL.md · 381 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 381 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Productivity Analyzer

Business Case

Problem Statement

Understanding productivity requires:

  • Tracking actual output rates
  • Comparing to planned rates
  • Identifying problem areas
  • Forecasting project completion

Solution

Analyze labor productivity data to identify trends, compare to benchmarks, and provide actionable insights.

Technical Implementation

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from typing import Dict, Any, List, Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
from datetime import date, timedelta
from enum import Enum


class ProductivityStatus(Enum):
    EXCELLENT = "excellent"    # >110% of planned
    ON_TARGET = "on_target"    # 90-110%
    BELOW = "below"            # 70-90%
    CRITICAL = "critical"      # <70%


@dataclass
class ProductivityRecord:
    date: date
    activity_code: str
    description: str
    planned_output: float
    actual_output: float
    unit: str
    manhours: float
    crew_size: int
    conditions: str  # weather, access issues


@dataclass
class ProductivityAnalysis:
    activity_code: str
    description: str
    total_planned: float
    total_actual: float
    total_manhours: float
    planned_rate: float  # unit per manhour
    actual_rate: float
    efficiency: float  # percentage
    status: ProductivityStatus
    trend: str  # improving, declining, stable


class ProductivityAnalyzer:
    """Analyze construction productivity data."""

    # Industry benchmark rates (unit per manhour)
    BENCHMARKS = {
        'concrete_pour': 0.5,      # m3/MH
        'rebar_install': 15,       # kg/MH
        'formwork': 0.8,           # m2/MH
        'brick_laying': 35,        # bricks/MH
        'drywall': 1.5,            # m2/MH
        'painting': 3.0,           # m2/MH
        'conduit': 8,              # m/MH
        'pipe': 3,                 # m/MH
        'excavation': 2.5,         # m3/MH
        'backfill': 3.0,           # m3/MH
    }

    def __init__(self):
        self.records: List[ProductivityRecord] = []

    def add_record(self,
                   date: date,
                   activity_code: str,
                   description: str,
                   planned_output: float,
                   actual_output: float,
                   unit: str,
                   manhours: float,
                   crew_size: int,
                   conditions: str = "normal"):
        """Add productivity record."""

        self.records.append(ProductivityRecord(
            date=date,
            activity_code=activity_code,
            description=description,
            planned_output=planned_output,
            actual_output=actual_output,
            unit=unit,
            manhours=manhours,
            crew_size=crew_size,
            conditions=conditions
        ))

    def import_from_dataframe(self, df: pd.DataFrame):
        """Import records from DataFrame."""
        for _, row in df.iterrows():
            self.add_record(
                date=pd.to_datetime(row['date']).date(),
                activity_code=row['activity_code'],
                description=row.get('description', ''),
                planned_output=float(row['planned_output']),
                actual_output=float(row['actual_output']),
                unit=row.get('unit', 'unit'),
                manhours=float(row['manhours']),
                crew_size=int(row.get('crew_size', 1)),
                conditions=row.get('conditions', 'normal')
            )

    def _get_status(self, efficiency: float) -> ProductivityStatus:
        """Determine productivity status."""
        if efficiency >= 110:
            return ProductivityStatus.EXCELLENT
        elif efficiency >= 90:
            return ProductivityStatus.ON_TARGET
        elif efficiency >= 70:
            return ProductivityStatus.BELOW
        else:
            return ProductivityStatus.CRITICAL

    def _calculate_trend(self, records: List[ProductivityRecord]) -> str:
        """Calculate productivity trend."""
        if len(records) < 3:
            return "insufficient_data"

        # Sort by date
        sorted_records = sorted(records, key=lambda x: x.date)

        # Calculate efficiency for first and last third
        n = len(sorted_records)
        third = n // 3

        early_efficiency = []
        late_efficiency = []

        for i, r in enumerate(sorted_records):
            if r.manhours > 0:
                eff = (r.actual_output / r.planned_output * 100) if r.planned_output > 0 else 0
                if i < third:
                    early_efficiency.append(eff)
                elif i >= n - third:
                    late_efficiency.append(eff)

        if not early_efficiency or not late_efficiency:
            return "stable"

        early_avg = np.mean(early_efficiency)
        late_avg = np.mean(late_efficiency)

        if late_avg > early_avg * 1.05:
            return "improving"
        elif late_avg < early_avg * 0.95:
            return "declining"
        else:
            return "stable"

    def analyze_activity(self, activity_code: str) -> Optional[ProductivityAnalysis]:
        """Analyze productivity for specific activity."""

        activity_records = [r for r in self.records if r.activity_code == activity_code]

        if not activity_records:
            return None

        total_planned = sum(r.planned_output for r in activity_records)
        total_actual = sum(r.actual_output for r in activity_records)
        total_manhours = sum(r.manhours for r in activity_records)

        planned_rate = total_planned / total_manhours if total_manhours > 0 else 0
        actual_rate = total_actual / total_manhours if total_manhours > 0 else 0
        efficiency = (total_actual / total_planned * 100) if total_planned > 0 else 0

        return ProductivityAnalysis(
            activity_code=activity_code,
            description=activity_records[0].description,
            total_planned=round(total_planned, 2),
            total_actual=round(total_actual, 2),
            total_manhours=round(total_manhours, 1),
            planned_rate=round(planned_rate, 3),
            actual_rate=round(actual_rate, 3),
            efficiency=round(efficiency, 1),
            status=self._get_status(efficiency),
            trend=self._calculate_trend(activity_records)
        )

    def analyze_all_activities(self) -> List[ProductivityAnalysis]:
        """Analyze all activities."""
        activities = set(r.activity_code for r in self.records)
        return [self.analyze_activity(code) for code in activities if self.analyze_activity(code)]

    def compare_to_benchmark(self, activity_code: str) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Compare activity to industry benchmark."""

        analysis = self.analyze_activity(activity_code)
        if not analysis:
            return {}

        # Find matching benchmark
        benchmark = None
        for key, value in self.BENCHMARKS.items():
            if key in activity_code.lower():
                benchmark = value
                break

        if benchmark is None:
            return {
                'activity': activity_code,
                'actual_rate': analysis.actual_rate,
                'benchmark': 'Not available',
                'vs_benchmark': 'N/A'
            }

        vs_benchmark = (analysis.actual_rate / benchmark * 100) if benchmark > 0 else 0

        return {
            'activity': activity_code,
            'actual_rate': analysis.actual_rate,
            'benchmark_rate': benchmark,
            'vs_benchmark_pct': round(vs_benchmark, 1),
            'recommendation': 'Above benchmark' if vs_benchmark >= 100 else 'Below benchmark - investigate'
        }

    def identify_problem_areas(self) -> List[Dict[str, Any]]:
        """Identify activities with productivity issues."""

        problems = []

        for analysis in self.analyze_all_activities():
            if analysis.status in [ProductivityStatus.BELOW, ProductivityStatus.CRITICAL]:
                problems.append({
                    'activity': analysis.activity_code,
                    'efficiency': analysis.efficiency,
                    'status': analysis.status.value,
                    'trend': analysis.trend,
                    'manhours_impacted': analysis.total_manhours,
                    'priority': 'HIGH' if analysis.status == ProductivityStatus.CRITICAL else 'MEDIUM'
                })

        return sorted(problems, key=lambda x: x['efficiency'])

    def forecast_completion(self,
                            activity_code: str,
                            remaining_quantity: float) -> Dict[str, Any]:
        """Forecast completion based on current productivity."""

        analysis = self.analyze_activity(activity_code)
        if not analysis or analysis.actual_rate == 0:
            return {}

        # Manhours needed at current rate
        manhours_needed = remaining_quantity / analysis.actual_rate

        # Average daily manhours
        activity_records = [r for r in self.records if r.activity_code == activity_code]
        avg_daily_mh = np.mean([r.manhours for r in activity_records]) if activity_records else 8

        days_needed = manhours_needed / avg_daily_mh if avg_daily_mh > 0 else 0

        return {
            'activity': activity_code,
            'remaining_qty': remaining_quantity,
            'current_rate': analysis.actual_rate,
            'manhours_needed': round(manhours_needed, 1),
            'days_needed': round(days_needed, 1),
            'estimated_completion': date.today() + timedelta(days=int(days_needed))
        }

    def export_analysis(self, output_path: str) -> str:
        """Export analysis to Excel."""

        with pd.ExcelWriter(output_path, engine='openpyxl') as writer:
            # Summary
            analyses = self.analyze_all_activities()
            summary_df = pd.DataFrame([
                {
                    'Activity': a.activity_code,
                    'Description': a.description,
                    'Planned': a.total_planned,
                    'Actual': a.total_actual,
                    'Manhours': a.total_manhours,
                    'Efficiency %': a.efficiency,
                    'Status': a.status.value,
                    'Trend': a.trend
                }
                for a in analyses
            ])
            summary_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Summary', index=False)

            # Problems
            problems = self.identify_problem_areas()
            if problems:
                problems_df = pd.DataFrame(problems)
                problems_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Problem Areas', index=False)

            # Raw data
            records_df = pd.DataFrame([
                {
                    'Date': r.date,
                    'Activity': r.activity_code,
                    'Planned': r.planned_output,
                    'Actual': r.actual_output,
                    'Unit': r.unit,
                    'Manhours': r.manhours,
                    'Crew': r.crew_size,
                    'Conditions': r.conditions
                }
                for r in self.records
            ])
            records_df.to_excel(writer, sheet_name='Raw Data', index=False)

        return output_path

Read the full file on GitHub · 381 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 381 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A f149e3b5f1c7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

productivity-analyzer is a skill published in the GitHub repository jdmorag97-rgb/DDC_Skills_for_AI_Agents_in_Construction (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 2,797 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to productivity-analyzer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens