Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jebel-Quant/rhiza-claude --skill rhiza-qualitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jebel-Quant/rhiza-claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jebel-quant/rhiza-claude/rhiza-quality)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jebel-quant/rhiza-claude/rhiza-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jebel-quant/rhiza-claude/rhiza-quality/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jebel-quant/rhiza-claude/rhiza-quality"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jebel-quant/rhiza-claude/rhiza-quality.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.09634 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.03854 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01927 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00963 |
Grade C, and why
rhiza-quality scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
`rm -rf`, and a fence that cannot parse is a documentation bug without running it. This is a copy
88% identical to quality, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago Changed · +2 lines 56938d92eb90
- 21d ago Changed · +11 lines a7e274f99469
- 22d ago Changed · +2 lines 4efa4d03913b
- 23d ago First seen · 596 lines · 52 tokens per session scan C 557caadd6578
rhiza-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jebel-Quant/rhiza-claude (6 stars, last pushed 7d ago), with no licence file. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 9,634 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (recursive force delete). It is 88% identical to quality, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
goal-test
A local experiment for testing a goal command that keeps an AI coding session working until a stated condition is judged complete. It uses a separate language model to evaluate the conversation after each assistant turn.
loop-gh-pr
A recipe for a scheduled GitHub pull-request watcher. It checks open pull requests for new activity and prepares read-only review drafts without posting comments or merging anything.
goal-plan-clean
A guide for creating a reusable plan-review loop. It repeatedly checks a plan, fixes blocking issues and suggestions, and stops after approval or a small number of review rounds.
loop-bb-pr
A command that prepares a repeating check for a Bitbucket pull request. A pull request is a request to review and merge code changes into a project.
loop-test
A local experiment for designing repeating checks with Claude Code’s loop command. It covers both fixed intervals and checks that schedule themselves again after each run.
commit
A guided process for committing code changes to Git. It checks the working tree, follows a conventional commit format, links a task when available, reviews the changes, and asks for approval.