Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill apply-market-size-first-screeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeffreytse/grimoire-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/apply-market-size-first-screening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/apply-market-size-first-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/apply-market-size-first-screening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/apply-market-size-first-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/apply-market-size-first-screening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.01417 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00567 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00283 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
apply-market-size-first-screening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Apply Market-Size-First Screening
Screen for a genuinely large addressable market as the first criterion in evaluating an early-stage investment — before assessing team or product quality — since even excellent execution operating within a small market structurally caps the achievable outcome, while a sufficiently large market can produce an outsized result even from imperfect execution.
Why This Is Best Practice
Adopted by: Don Valentine, founder of Sequoia Capital, is widely documented for a market-first screening philosophy — explicitly prioritizing the size and growth potential of the addressable market over the specific founding team as the primary initial screen — a contrasting emphasis to the more founder-first framing associated with other venture investors, reflecting Sequoia's early investment decisions (including Apple and Atari) made substantially on the basis of large emerging market opportunity.
Impact: Valentine's documented reasoning specifically argues that a mediocre team in a genuinely large, growing market can still produce a large outcome simply from market growth carrying the business forward, while even an exceptional team operating in a small or non-growing market faces a structural ceiling on the achievable outcome regardless of execution quality — a distinction that shapes which opportunities are worth pursuing at the earliest, highest-uncertainty stage of evaluation.
Why best: At the earliest stage of company evaluation, team quality and product-market fit are both still highly uncertain and difficult to assess with confidence — but the size of the underlying addressable market is comparatively more assessable and more durably determinative of the venture-scale outcome a fund needs from its winners (see apply-ten-bagger-strategy). Screening for market size first filters out opportunities that, even in the best case, cannot produce the outsized outcome venture investing depends on, before investing further evaluation effort in team and product assessment.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed b1ebbb6eba06
- 1mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 71cfe2e647b1
apply-market-size-first-screening is a skill published in the GitHub repository jeffreytse/grimoire-core (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 1,417 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
azure-cost-management-api
In PowerShell, inline JSON for Cost Management API causes "Unsupported Media Type" errors.
stock-analysis-lead
Orchestrate a US-stock investment analysis — classify sector archetype, fetch SEC filings, dispatch a tiered fan-out of six vertical equity-research agents (business model, earnings quality, balance sheet, management, industry, peer comparison) over a validated JSON findings contract, then synthesize a buy/hold/sell…
stock-earnings-quality-review
Review a US-listed company's earnings quality, cash-flow integrity, and operating leverage for an equity-research workup. Covers operating cash flow vs net income drift, free cash flow trajectory, capex character (maintenance vs expansion), equity issuance / shareholder-return yield, revenue-quality signals…
stock-peer-comparison-review
Independently benchmark a US-listed target equity against 2-4 closest peers on a fixed 12-item ratio panel — growth rates, profitability, capital intensity, balance sheet leverage, capital returns, and valuation multiples. Provides cross-validation for moat and market-share claims made by the business and industry…
stock-balance-sheet-review
Review a US-listed company's balance sheet health for an equity-research workup. Covers net-debt/EBITDA leverage, current ratio, cash runway, goodwill concentration and impairment history, DSO trend, inventory days, off-balance-sheet items (operating leases, contingent liabilities), and pension underfunding. Trigger…
stock-industry-review
Review a US-listed company's industry position and competitive moat for an equity-research workup. Covers Porter Five Forces scan, market-share trend (absolute and relative to industry growth), TAM size and trajectory, unit economics where disclosed (LTV/CAC, unit gross margin), moat classification (network / brand /…