design-compliance-risk-assessment

design-compliance-risk-assessment is a skill for Claude Code from jeffreytse/grimoire-core. It costs 63 tokens per session (1,310 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured review of the laws, regulations, and standards an organization must follow, including the likelihood and impact of failing to meet each obligation. It ranks the risks so the most urgent gaps can be addressed first.

In plain words
What is it for?
Building a compliance risk register, scoring regulatory failures, and planning ongoing reviews of compliance obligations.
Why use it?
One-off legal or compliance checks do not show the organization's full regulatory exposure or provide a consistent way to prioritize work.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the grimoire-business plugin — 156 skills shipped together

Good fit Building a compliance risk register, scoring regulatory failures, and planning ongoing reviews of compliance obligations.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/design-compliance-risk-assessment
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jeffreytse/grimoire-core --skill design-compliance-risk-assessment
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeffreytse/grimoire-core

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install grimoire-business, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 156 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for design-compliance-risk-assessment

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/design-compliance-risk-assessment/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/design-compliance-risk-assessment)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/design-compliance-risk-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/design-compliance-risk-assessment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for design-compliance-risk-assessment

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/design-compliance-risk-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeffreytse/grimoire-core/design-compliance-risk-assessment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 63 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,310 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00063 $0.01310
Opus 5.5 $0.00025 $0.00524
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00262
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00131

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 35d6e36e8112, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-compliance-risk-assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/business/operations/skills/design-compliance-risk-assessment/SKILL.md · 68 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Design Compliance Risk Assessment

Identify and prioritize the organization's regulatory and compliance risk exposure on an ongoing basis — scoring the likelihood and impact of specific compliance failures across each applicable regulation or standard — rather than relying only on one-off contract reviews or a general risk-management process that isn't specifically structured around the organization's actual regulatory obligations.

Why This Is Best Practice

Adopted by: ISO 37301, "Compliance Management Systems — Requirements with Guidance for Use," is the internationally recognized standard for organizational compliance management, requiring certified organizations to maintain an ongoing process for identifying, assessing, and prioritizing compliance obligations and the risk of failing to meet them, distinct from the organization's general enterprise risk management process. Impact: An organization relying only on ad hoc compliance checks — a one-off contract review here, an incident-driven policy update there — lacks a systematic view of its full regulatory exposure and has no consistent basis for prioritizing which compliance obligations most urgently need attention; a dedicated compliance risk assessment specifically fills this gap by treating regulatory obligations as their own risk category requiring dedicated identification and scoring. Why best: A general enterprise risk management process (see apply-iso-31000-risk-framework) can miss the specific structure of compliance risk, which is tied to a defined, often changing set of external regulatory obligations rather than internally generated risks — a dedicated compliance risk assessment process specifically tracks applicable regulations, assesses the likelihood and impact of failing to meet each, and prioritizes remediation accordingly, providing a level of regulatory-specific rigor a generic risk process doesn't guarantee.

Sources: ISO 37301:2021, "Compliance Management Systems — Requirements with Guidance for Use," International Organization for Standardization

Read the full file on GitHub · 68 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A 35d6e36e8112

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-compliance-risk-assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository jeffreytse/grimoire-core (5 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,310 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.