Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jeffrigby/somepulp-agents --skill update-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeffrigby/somepulp-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffrigby/somepulp-agents/update-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffrigby/somepulp-agents/update-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeffrigby/somepulp-agents/update-docs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeffrigby/somepulp-agents/update-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeffrigby/somepulp-agents/update-docs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00220 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00110 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
update-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use the update-docs agent to analyze recent code changes and propose documentation updates.
Workflow:
- Launch the update-docs agent to analyze git history, apply routine low-risk fixes, and return a proposed-updates plan for any significant changes
- Review the returned plan and confirm significant changes with the user (via AskUserQuestion) before applying them
- Apply the approved updates
This will:
- Analyze git history for undocumented changes
- Update CLAUDE.md to reflect current patterns and conventions
- Sync README with current project state
- Add CHANGELOG entries for recent changes
- Optimize documentation for AI agent consumption
Scope and time range: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 24 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 09df30762d6b
update-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository jeffrigby/somepulp-agents (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 220 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-09.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
pr-review
Comprehensive code review for pull requests using parallel multi-agent analysis. Audits CLAUDE.md compliance, checks for bugs, analyzes git history, reviews comments, and filters by confidence score. Use when reviewing a GitHub PR, mentions "code review", "review this PR", or "/code-review".
phx-watch-pr
Watch an Elixir/Phoenix PR with an Amp Orb keep-alive lease until required non-deployment CI is green and review threads are resolved.
pr-threshold
Track commit accumulation and trigger PR when thresholds crossed.
commit-message
Reviews working-tree changes, then drafts a Conventional Commits title/body and states the semantic-release version bump a single such commit would imply. Also notes which defensive-code categories were touched. Use when the user wants to commit recent work, prepare a Conventional Commits message, or asks for…