Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jellydn/my-ai-tools --skill visual-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jellydn/my-ai-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/visual-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/visual-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/visual-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/visual-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jellydn/my-ai-tools/visual-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00697 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
visual-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Visual PR
Post a compact visual explanation of a pull request as a comment. Do not replace or append to the pull request description.
Workflow
1. Find or create the pull request
gh pr view --json url,number,title,state,baseRefName,headRefName 2>/dev/null
- Use the open pull request for the current branch when one exists.
- If no pull request exists, inspect the branch, commit task changes when needed, push it, and create a draft pull request according to the repository's conventions. Do not use the visual outline as the pull request body.
- Ask the user to select a pull request only when the current branch has no relevant work and there is no safe pull request to create.
2. Understand the change
- Read the ticket and relevant task artifacts.
- Read the complete pull request diff and enough surrounding code to understand behavior and ownership.
- Use
gh pr viewto collect metadata and changed files. - Identify only the contracts, responsibilities, and runtime paths that a reviewer needs to understand.
3. Write the visual outline
Read $SKILL_PATH/references/comment-template.md, then write the completed comment to a temporary file:
COMMENT_FILE=$(mktemp "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/visual-pr-comment.XXXXXX")
Keep the outline concise:
- Explain Why the change in exactly one sentence.
- Put only reviewer warnings, migrations, compatibility constraints, deliberate omissions, or surprising decisions in
Special things to note. Use
- None.when there are none. - Make Change outline a structural view, not prose or a file-by-file changelog.
- Use one to three focused views: a data or API shape, pseudocode, a shallow file tree, a component tree, or a call, control, or data flow.
- Prefer
diffblocks for changes to an existing shape. Show the complete target shape when most of it is new. - Use real names from the diff and omit categories that did not change.
4. Publish and verify the comment
COMMENT_URL=$("$SKILL_PATH/scripts/publish-comment.sh" <number> "$COMMENT_FILE")
test -n "$COMMENT_URL"
printf '%s\n' "$COMMENT_URL"
rm -f "$COMMENT_FILE"
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 77 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 3e9cd3da4ca4
visual-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository jellydn/my-ai-tools (123 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 697 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-07.
Other skills, from other repositories
check
Reviews diffs, PRs, release readiness, and publishing follow-through. Use when asked to review, triage issues or PRs, or ship. Not for debugging root causes or prose.
antfu-create-pr
Create a reviewable GitHub pull request from the current branch with a Conventional Commits title, a concise evidence-based body, and before/after screenshots for UI changes. Use when asked to open, create, publish, or prepare a PR.
factory-babysit-pr
Experimental workflow for babysitting one explicitly authorized pull or merge request. Use to monitor its live review state and checks, fix actionable in-scope findings, and apply separate reply, approval, merge, and soak gates.
factory-review-prs
Experimental workflow for reviewing configured repositories' pull requests. Use for manual or scheduled PR triage, approval, or merge decisions.
comet-github-pr-review
A read-only review process for pull requests in Comet's GitHub repositories. A pull request is a proposed code change; the review checks its current code, related issue, comments, merge status, and automated checks.
pr-description-writer
Redacta una descripción de pull request clara y estructurada a partir de un diff de git, resumen de rama o lista de commits. Úsalo cuando te pidan escribir una descripción de PR, redactar una solicitud de cambios o documentar cambios de código. Produce una descripción con resumen, motivación, cambios realizados, pasos…