Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/code-explanationnpx skills add JeremyDev87/codingbuddy --skill code-explanationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JeremyDev87/codingbuddyWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01792 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00896 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
code-explanation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 264 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Explanation
Overview
Understanding code is a prerequisite to improving it. Rushed explanations create misunderstanding that compounds over time.
Core principle: Explain at the right level of abstraction. Start high, drill down only when needed.
Iron Law:
READ BEFORE EXPLAINING. UNDERSTAND BEFORE SIMPLIFYING.
Never explain code you haven't fully read. Never simplify what you haven't fully understood.
When to Use
- Onboarding new team members to a codebase
- Code review: explaining design decisions
- Understanding legacy code before modifying it
- Explaining an AI agent's recommendations
- Documenting complex algorithms or patterns
- Understanding error stack traces
The Five Levels of Explanation
Choose the level based on your audience and purpose:
| Level | Audience | Goal | Depth |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1: Bird's Eye | Non-technical stakeholders | What does this system do? | Architecture diagram |
| L2: Module | New developers | How is this organized? | Module/file structure |
| L3: Function | Developers onboarding | What does this code do? | Function by function |
| L4: Line | Debugging partners | Why is this written this way? | Line by line |
| L5: Algorithm | Algorithm review | How does this work mathematically? | Proof-level |
The Explanation Process
Phase 1: Read First
1. Read the entire file/function before explaining anything
2. Identify the core purpose (what problem does this solve?)
3. Note dependencies (what does this require?)
4. Note side effects (what does this change?)
5. Note error handling (what can go wrong?)
Phase 2: Bird's Eye View (Always Start Here)
**What this is:** One sentence describing purpose
**What problem it solves:** The business/technical need
**How it fits:** Where it sits in the larger system
**Key dependencies:** What it relies on
**Key outputs:** What it produces or modifies
Example:
**What this is:** RulesService — file system reader for AI coding rules
**What problem it solves:** Provides a unified interface for reading and searching
.ai-rules files regardless of directory structure
**How it fits:** Used by McpModule to serve rules via MCP protocol
**Key dependencies:** Node.js fs/promises, glob patterns
**Key outputs:** Array of Rule objects with name, content, and metadata
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 264 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 1ab5e9e360fc
code-explanation is a skill published in the GitHub repository JeremyDev87/codingbuddy (31 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,792 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
om-integration-builder
Build integration provider packages for the Open Mercato Integration Marketplace (payment, shipping, data-sync, webhook). Scaffolds the npm package, adapter, credentials, widget injection, webhook processing, health checks, i18n, tests. Triggers on "build integration", "add provider", "integrate with…
om-ds-guardian
Design System Guardian for Open Mercato. Use for frontend UI work, design-system compliance reviews, semantic token migration, hardcoded color or typography cleanup, DS-compliant page scaffolding, and common DS violations such as arbitrary text sizes, raw color classes, or missing shared states. Prefer this skill…
om-integration-tests
Run and create QA integration tests (Playwright TypeScript), including executing the full suite, converting optional markdown scenarios, and generating new tests from specs or feature descriptions. Defers all environment boot/reuse to the om-prepare-test-env skill and attaches to the shared descriptor it writes. Use…
om-create-agents-md
Create or rewrite AGENTS.md files for Open Mercato packages and modules. Use this skill when adding a new package, creating a new module, or when an existing AGENTS.md needs to be created or refactored. Ensures prescriptive tone, the Always/Ask First/Never/Validation Commands boundary structure, MUST-style rules…
om-smart-test
Run only the tests affected by changed code. Use when the user says "run affected tests", "run smart tests", "test only what changed", "run tests for this PR", "run tests for my changes", "selective tests", or asks to run tests without running the full suite.
om-auto-qa-scenarios
Generate a human QA report for a window of merged PRs (date floor, PR-number floor, or default last 7 days) and ship it as a docs-only PR against develop. Groups work into P0/P1/P2 testing routes with click paths, verification points, and risk callouts. Writes markdown + HTML under .ai/analysis/. Hands off to…