Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add JeremyDev87/codingbuddy --skill error-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JeremyDev87/codingbuddyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/error-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/error-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/error-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/error-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/error-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01891 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00756 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
error-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Error Analysis
Overview
Errors are information. Stack traces are maps. Reading them carefully reveals root cause faster than guessing.
Core principle: Classify the error before diagnosing it. Different error classes have different diagnostic approaches.
Relationship to systematic-debugging: Use error-analysis to understand WHAT the error is and WHERE it originates. Use systematic-debugging to find WHY it happens and implement the fix.
Iron Law:
READ THE ENTIRE STACK TRACE BEFORE FORMING ANY HYPOTHESIS
The answer is almost always in the error message. Most debugging failures are reading failures.
When to Use
- Encountering a new error message
- Stack trace from production logs
- Unexpected application behavior (silent failure)
- CI/CD pipeline failures
- Type errors, runtime errors, build errors
Error Classification
First, classify the error type:
| Class | Symptoms | Common Causes |
|---|---|---|
| Syntax Error | Fails at parse/compile time | Typo, missing bracket, wrong syntax |
| Type Error | TypeScript compiler error | Wrong type, missing null check |
| Runtime Error | Fails during execution | Null reference, division by zero |
| Logic Error | Wrong output, no crash | Algorithm mistake, off-by-one |
| Network Error | Connection failures | Service down, timeout, firewall |
| Config Error | App won't start | Missing env var, wrong path |
| Concurrency Error | Intermittent failures | Race condition, deadlock |
| Memory Error | Growing memory, crash | Memory leak, large allocation |
Reading Stack Traces
Anatomy of a Stack Trace
Error: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'name') ← Error type + message
at RulesService.getRule (/app/src/rules/rules.service.ts:42:18) ← Closest to error
at McpService.handleTool (/app/src/mcp/mcp.service.ts:87:32)
at McpModule.dispatch (/app/src/mcp/mcp.module.ts:23:12) ← Furthest from error
Reading order:
- Error message — WHAT went wrong
- First frame — WHERE it broke (your code closest to error)
- Subsequent frames — HOW we got there (call chain)
- Last frame — ENTRY POINT that triggered the chain
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 252 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 9bb49134c644
error-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository JeremyDev87/codingbuddy (31 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,891 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
roam
Codebase comprehension via roam-code CLI. Use when exploring codebases, planning modifications, debugging failures, assessing PR risk, or checking architecture health. Triggers on: understanding project structure, pre-change safety checks, finding symbols/files, blast radius analysis, affected tests, health scoring…
ring:searching-code
Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…
ring:using-assert
Using lib-observability/assert, Lerian's runtime assertion package, in two modes. Sweep Mode detects panic()/log.Fatal zero-panic violations, DIY invariant checks, hand-rolled domain predicates, and missing InitAssertionMetrics. Reference Mode catalogs the asserter lifecycle, domain predicates, observability trident…
ring:fixing-lint
Fixing lint to a clean state: runs the linter, groups reported issues into independent streams, and dispatches one parallel fixer agent per stream (ring:backend-go for Go, ring:general-purpose otherwise), iterating until clean. Use when a codebase has lint errors across multiple files. Skip for a single error (fix…
ring:test-driven-development
Enforcing the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR loop: write one failing test and watch it fail, write minimal code to pass, then refactor green. Use when starting implementation of a new feature or bugfix, or writing any new production code. Requires pasted failure output as proof of RED; code written before its test must be…
ring:detecting-goroutine-leaks
Detecting goroutine leaks in Go: greps for goroutine patterns, audits goleak coverage (VerifyTestMain/VerifyNone), runs goleak, and dispatches ring:backend-go to fix leaks and add regression tests. Use after implementation or during review when code spawns goroutines or a leak is suspected. Runs before…