Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/executing-plansnpx skills add JeremyDev87/codingbuddy --skill executing-plansgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JeremyDev87/codingbuddyWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00479 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00096 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
executing-plans scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to Executing Plans — 12 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Executing Plans
Overview
Load plan, review critically, execute tasks in batches, report for review between batches.
Core principle: Batch execution with checkpoints for architect review.
Announce at start: "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
The Process
Step 1: Load and Review Plan
- Read plan file
- Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
- If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
- If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
Step 2: Execute Batch
Default: First 3 tasks
For each task:
- Mark as in_progress
- Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
- Run verifications as specified
- Mark as completed
Step 3: Report
When batch complete:
- Show what was implemented
- Show verification output
- Say: "Ready for feedback."
Step 4: Continue
Based on feedback:
- Apply changes if needed
- Execute next batch
- Repeat until complete
Step 5: Complete Development
After all tasks complete and verified:
- Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
- REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
- Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
When to Stop and Ask for Help
STOP executing immediately when:
- Hit a blocker mid-batch (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)
- Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
- You don't understand an instruction
- Verification fails repeatedly
Ask for clarification rather than guessing.
When to Revisit Earlier Steps
Return to Review (Step 1) when:
- Partner updates the plan based on your feedback
- Fundamental approach needs rethinking
Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.
Remember
- Review plan critically first
- Follow plan steps exactly
- Don't skip verifications
- Reference skills when plan says to
- Between batches: just report and wait
- Stop when blocked, don't guess
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 77 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 582937183ad9
executing-plans is a skill published in the GitHub repository JeremyDev87/codingbuddy (31 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 479 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to Executing Plans, differing in 12 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
om-integration-builder
Build integration provider packages for the Open Mercato Integration Marketplace (payment, shipping, data-sync, webhook). Scaffolds the npm package, adapter, credentials, widget injection, webhook processing, health checks, i18n, tests. Triggers on "build integration", "add provider", "integrate with…
om-ds-guardian
Design System Guardian for Open Mercato. Use for frontend UI work, design-system compliance reviews, semantic token migration, hardcoded color or typography cleanup, DS-compliant page scaffolding, and common DS violations such as arbitrary text sizes, raw color classes, or missing shared states. Prefer this skill…
om-integration-tests
Run and create QA integration tests (Playwright TypeScript), including executing the full suite, converting optional markdown scenarios, and generating new tests from specs or feature descriptions. Defers all environment boot/reuse to the om-prepare-test-env skill and attaches to the shared descriptor it writes. Use…
om-create-agents-md
Create or rewrite AGENTS.md files for Open Mercato packages and modules. Use this skill when adding a new package, creating a new module, or when an existing AGENTS.md needs to be created or refactored. Ensures prescriptive tone, the Always/Ask First/Never/Validation Commands boundary structure, MUST-style rules…
om-smart-test
Run only the tests affected by changed code. Use when the user says "run affected tests", "run smart tests", "test only what changed", "run tests for this PR", "run tests for my changes", "selective tests", or asks to run tests without running the full suite.
om-auto-qa-scenarios
Generate a human QA report for a window of merged PRs (date floor, PR-number floor, or default last 7 days) and ship it as a docs-only PR against develop. Groups work into P0/P1/P2 testing routes with click paths, verification points, and risk callouts. Writes markdown + HTML under .ai/analysis/. Hands off to…