Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/pr-all-in-onenpx skills add JeremyDev87/codingbuddy --skill pr-all-in-onegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JeremyDev87/codingbuddyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/pr-all-in-one)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/pr-all-in-one"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/pr-all-in-one.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02689 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01345 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00538 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00269 |
Grade A, and why
pr-all-in-one scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 367 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR All-in-One
Overview
Streamlines commit-to-PR workflow with auto-commit, smart issue linking, and multi-language support. Handles the complete flow from uncommitted changes to published PR with intelligent branch management, logical commit grouping, and context-aware PR descriptions.
When to Use
- Any situation requiring PR creation
- When uncommitted changes exist
- When an existing PR needs updating
- When you want to handle branch creation and PR in one step
- When you want to auto-link Issue IDs to the PR
Usage
/pr-all-in-one [target-branch] [issue-id]
Examples:
/pr-all-in-one- PR to default branch, issue ID from branch name/pr-all-in-one develop- PR to develop, issue ID from branch name/pr-all-in-one main ISSUE-12345- PR to main with issue ID/pr-all-in-one ISSUE-12345- PR to default branch with issue ID
Argument Parsing:
target-branch: Branch name (main, develop, master, etc.)issue-id: Matches configured issue pattern (JIRA-123, #456, ENG-789, etc.)- Arguments can be in any order
- If only one argument provided, checks if it's an issue pattern first
Configuration
Location: .claude/pr-config.json
First-time run: Interactive setup flow guides you through configuration.
See configuration-guide.md for:
- All configuration options
- Setup wizard walkthrough
- Example configurations
Workflow (9 Steps)
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Workflow Execution │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Step 1: Parse arguments
├── Issue pattern → issue ID
├── Branch name → target branch
└── Defaults from config
Step 2: Check git status & branch
├── git status (uncommitted changes)
└── git branch --show-current
Step 3: Handle main branch case
├── If on target branch with changes
│ ├── Analyze changes for branch name
│ ├── Create new branch: git checkout -b <type>/<description>
│ └── Proceed to Step 4
└── If on target branch without changes → Exit
Step 4: Auto-commit changes
├── Analyze with git diff
├── Group by feature/purpose
└── For each group:
├── git add <related-files>
├── Conventional commit message (English)
└── NO AI signature/Co-Authored-By
Step 5: Push to remote
└── git push -u origin <branch> (if needed)
Step 6: Check existing PR
└── gh pr view --json url,title,body
Step 7: Update existing PR (if exists)
├── Analyze all commits: git log <target>..HEAD
├── Read prLanguage from .claude/pr-config.json
├── Select template based on prLanguage:
│ ├── "en" → English Template
│ ├── "ko" → Korean Template
│ └── "bilingual" → Bilingual Template
├── Generate title:
│ ├── "en"/"bilingual" → English title
│ └── "ko" → Korean title
├── Generate body with selected template
├── Merge with .github/pull_request_template.md (if exists)
├── NO AI signature
└── gh pr edit --title --body
Step 8: Create new PR (if not exists)
├── Analyze all commits
├── Read prLanguage from .claude/pr-config.json
├── Select template based on prLanguage:
│ ├── "en" → English Template
│ ├── "ko" → Korean Template
│ └── "bilingual" → Bilingual Template
├── Generate title:
│ ├── "en"/"bilingual" → English (e.g., "feat: add auth")
│ └── "ko" → Korean (e.g., "feat: add authentication")
├── Generate body with selected template + commit analysis
├── Merge with project template if exists
├── NO AI signature
└── gh pr create --draft --base <target>
Step 9: Return PR URL
└── If UI changes detected → suggest screenshots
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 367 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f33123cbe243
pr-all-in-one is a skill published in the GitHub repository JeremyDev87/codingbuddy (31 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,689 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:searching-code
Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…
ring:exploring-codebases
Exploring a codebase across phases: scopes the target, detects architecture, components, and layers, deep-dives each discovered perspective, then synthesizes findings into actionable guidance with file:line evidence. Use to understand how a feature or system works before planning changes, or to orient on an unfamiliar…
ring:auditing-dependency-security
Auditing a dependency for supply-chain risk before install (pip/npm/go/cargo): checks typosquatting, maintainer/age risk, vulnerability DBs (OSV, GHSA, Socket), and lockfile hash pinning, then emits a risk score and approve/conditional/escalate/block decision. Use when adding or updating a dependency, reviewing a…
ring:checking-frontend-quality
Checking frontend quality against changed UI via ring:qa-frontend in accessibility, visual, e2e, or performance mode and aggregating pass/fail verdicts. Use when a frontend change needs standalone a11y, visual-snapshot, Playwright e2e, or Lighthouse/Core-Web-Vitals validation outside the dev cycle. Skip for…
bzdesignprompt
为前端或网页设计任务选择并下载合适的 DESIGN.md 模板。当用户需要网页设计模板、UI 风格参考、设计系统、落地页或前端界面设计时,浏览长亭百智云 UI 设计模板库,根据产品场景和视觉偏好匹配模板,并将完整 DESIGN.md 保存到项目中。.
verify-quality
Verify code quality including naming conventions, organization, documentation, and general best practices. Use when asked to "verify quality", "check code quality", or "review code organization".