Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/test-coverage-gatenpx skills add JeremyDev87/codingbuddy --skill test-coverage-gategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JeremyDev87/codingbuddyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/test-coverage-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/test-coverage-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremydev87/codingbuddy/test-coverage-gate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00059 | $0.02191 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01095 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00438 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00219 |
Grade A, and why
test-coverage-gate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 304 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Coverage Gate
Overview
Untested code is unverified code. Shipping without coverage data is shipping blind.
This skill enforces minimum test coverage thresholds before code leaves your machine. It detects your coverage tool, runs the analysis, compares results against thresholds, and blocks shipping if coverage is insufficient.
Core principle: No code ships without meeting coverage thresholds. Period.
Iron Law:
NO SHIP WITHOUT COVERAGE GATE PASSING
If coverage is below threshold, the PR does not get created.
When to Use
Always, before:
- Running
/shipto create a PR - Merging feature branches
- Tagging releases
- Deploying to staging or production
Especially when:
- Adding new features (new code must be tested)
- Refactoring (coverage must not drop)
- Fixing bugs (regression test required)
- Touching critical paths (auth, payments, data processing)
Skip only when:
- Documentation-only changes (no source code modified)
- Configuration file changes (non-code)
- Generated code explicitly excluded from coverage
Configuration
Default Thresholds
Line Coverage: 80%
Branch Coverage: 80%
Function Coverage: 80%
Custom Thresholds
Override defaults per project via codingbuddy.config.json, package.json, or tool-native config:
// codingbuddy.config.json
{
"coverage": {
"thresholds": {
"lines": 80,
"branches": 80,
"functions": 80
},
"tool": "auto", // "vitest" | "jest" | "c8" | "istanbul" | "auto"
"excludePatterns": [
"**/*.config.*",
"**/generated/**",
"**/migrations/**"
]
}
}
// package.json (alternative)
{
"coverageGate": {
"lines": 80,
"branches": 80,
"functions": 80
}
}
Per-Tool Native Config
If thresholds are already defined in your test tool's config, the gate respects them:
| Tool | Config Location |
|---|---|
| Vitest | vitest.config.ts → test.coverage.thresholds |
| Jest | jest.config.ts → coverageThreshold.global |
| c8 | .c8rc.json or package.json → c8 |
| Istanbul/nyc | .nycrc or package.json → nyc |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 304 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A e8f787e776d2
test-coverage-gate is a skill published in the GitHub repository JeremyDev87/codingbuddy (31 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 2,191 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ring:searching-code
Forensic code search and analysis with optional Chain of Draft (CoD) ultra-concise mode. Five-phase methodology (clarification, planning, execution, analysis, synthesis) with severity assessment. Use for targeted investigation of specific patterns, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Skip for broad architecture mapping (use…
ring:exploring-codebases
Exploring a codebase across phases: scopes the target, detects architecture, components, and layers, deep-dives each discovered perspective, then synthesizes findings into actionable guidance with file:line evidence. Use to understand how a feature or system works before planning changes, or to orient on an unfamiliar…
ring:auditing-dependency-security
Auditing a dependency for supply-chain risk before install (pip/npm/go/cargo): checks typosquatting, maintainer/age risk, vulnerability DBs (OSV, GHSA, Socket), and lockfile hash pinning, then emits a risk score and approve/conditional/escalate/block decision. Use when adding or updating a dependency, reviewing a…
ring:checking-frontend-quality
Checking frontend quality against changed UI via ring:qa-frontend in accessibility, visual, e2e, or performance mode and aggregating pass/fail verdicts. Use when a frontend change needs standalone a11y, visual-snapshot, Playwright e2e, or Lighthouse/Core-Web-Vitals validation outside the dev cycle. Skip for…
bzdesignprompt
为前端或网页设计任务选择并下载合适的 DESIGN.md 模板。当用户需要网页设计模板、UI 风格参考、设计系统、落地页或前端界面设计时,浏览长亭百智云 UI 设计模板库,根据产品场景和视觉偏好匹配模板,并将完整 DESIGN.md 保存到项目中。.
verify-quality
Verify code quality including naming conventions, organization, documentation, and general best practices. Use when asked to "verify quality", "check code quality", or "review code organization".