Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jerseycheese/Narraitor. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jerseycheese/Narraitor/main/.claude/skills/narraitor-change-control/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jerseycheese/NarraitorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jerseycheese/narraitor/narraitor-change-control)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jerseycheese/narraitor/narraitor-change-control"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jerseycheese/narraitor/narraitor-change-control/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jerseycheese/narraitor/narraitor-change-control"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jerseycheese/narraitor/narraitor-change-control.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.01582 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00791 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00316 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00158 |
Grade A, and why
narraitor-change-control scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Narraitor change control
1. Purpose
Keep status honest. Every claim about a change has a required evidence tier; corrections append rather than overwrite; no gate gets routed around. This skill is load-bearing for all others — when in doubt about whether you may say "done", the answer is here.
2. When to use
Before any status claim; before opening/merging a PR; before re-baselining anything; after discovering a prior claim (yours or a doc's) was wrong.
3. When not to use
- Choosing which tests to run →
narraitor-validation-and-qa. - Deciding ship vs hold on product grounds →
narraitor-feature-experiment-lifecycle.
4. Inputs required
The diff (or planned diff), its classification (below), and the artifacts you already have.
5. Procedure
Step 1 — classify the change. The class sets the minimum gate:
| Class | Minimum gate before "done" |
|---|---|
| Docs-only | Claims in the doc verified against the tree; stale refs not propagated |
| Code (logic) | Quality gate (test, type-check, lint, lint:css) green locally + test added/updated + original failing case re-run if it's a fix |
| Component / user-facing UI | Code gate PLUS parity ladder >= S2 per narraitor-storybook-app-parity (S3 for user-facing features) — unit-green + story alone NEVER earns "done" for UI |
| Test-only | The test fails without the fix / passes with it — shown, not asserted |
| AI-route / AI-behavior | Code gate PLUS multi-world evidence per narraitor-ai-quality-discipline; prompt changes per narraitor-prompt-template-governance |
| Design-system / CSS | Code gate PLUS lint:css, both color schemes (light + dark) checked — one design system since ADR-013 — visual baselines regenerated together if shared chrome moved |
| Store-shape | Code gate PLUS the blast-radius checklist in narraitor-architecture-contract (persist migrate!) |
| Content/copy | Project voice, no "AI" in user-facing strings, baseline impact checked |
Step 2 — status language is earned, not decorative:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 79 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A ab3fba4b3a68
narraitor-change-control is a skill published in the GitHub repository jerseycheese/Narraitor (30 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 1,582 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…