runtime-log-review

runtime-log-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from JetXu-LLM/DocMason. It costs 27 tokens per session (916 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A workflow for reviewing DocMason’s runtime logs through prepared summaries and candidate reports. Runtime logs are records of what the system did while handling requests.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to refresh the runtime review, inspect recent activity, investigate failures, and find cases that may need benchmarking or follow-up.
Why use it?
It makes it easier to identify failures and useful test cases without manually browsing raw log files or confusing derived records with the primary state.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to refresh the runtime review, inspect recent activity, investigate failures, and find cases that may need benchmarking or follow-up.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jetxu-llm/docmason/runtime-log-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add JetXu-LLM/DocMason --skill runtime-log-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JetXu-LLM/DocMason

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for runtime-log-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jetxu-llm/docmason/runtime-log-review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jetxu-llm/docmason/runtime-log-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jetxu-llm/docmason/runtime-log-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jetxu-llm/docmason/runtime-log-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 27 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 916 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00027 $0.00916
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00458
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00183
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00092

Measured 8d ago against content hash f7cc41b270c1, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

runtime-log-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/canonical/runtime-log-review/SKILL.md · 68 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Runtime Log Review

Use this skill when the task is to review recent runtime activity, identify failures, or extract candidate cases from DocMason logs.

This is an explicit operator-facing workflow. The user may ask for it directly, or ask may route here automatically when the real intent is runtime review rather than question answering.

Required Capabilities

  • local file access
  • shell or command execution
  • ability to inspect structured JSON output

If the agent cannot inspect local runtime logs, stop and explain that log review is not possible.

Procedure

  1. For an explicit operator refresh, prefer docmason workflow runtime-log-review --json so the derived summary and the request-level audit record are regenerated together.
  2. Start with runtime/logs/review/summary.json and runtime/logs/review/benchmark-candidates.json when they exist.
    • treat live conversation state under runtime/state/ as the owner and runtime/logs/conversations/ as projection-only
      • projection-only means a derived mirror, not the primary truth surface
    • require canonical ask ownership before classifying a case as interactive-ask; workflow names, conversation linkage, or reconciliation leftovers alone are not enough
      • here canonical ask ownership means the case is backed by a governed ask turn and linked runtime artifacts, not only host transcript residue
  3. Use the summary modes that best match the request:
    • recent activity
    • no-result retrieval sessions
    • artifact-rich queries that still degraded or returned the wrong source family
    • degraded answer-first traces
    • trace cases where artifact supports existed but the final answer still remained partially grounded or unresolved
    • repeated failure patterns
    • frequently consulted sources or units
    • candidate benchmark or operator-review cases
    • real interaction activity versus synthetic evaluation traffic
    • active waiting shared jobs
    • active confirmation-required shared jobs
    • orphaned query sessions or retrieval traces that are not backed by committed truth
  4. When the summary shows a case worth deeper inspection, open the referenced query-session or retrieval-trace JSON directly.
  5. If the operator needs the underlying evidence, route to retrieval, provenance tracing, or grounded-answer rather than guessing from log metadata alone.
  6. Keep the workflow descriptive and review-oriented. Do not mutate prompts, skills, overlays, or benchmarks from inside this workflow.
  7. If you need to export a scratch review summary and the user did not specify a destination, place it under runtime/agent-work/.
  8. Treat runtime/logs/review/requests/<request_id>.json as the canonical audit surface for the explicit review request that refreshed or read the review-side outputs.
  9. Return the operator-facing review summary and recommended next steps to the main agent.

Read the full file on GitHub · 68 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 68 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A f7cc41b270c1

Subscribe to this mod's changes

runtime-log-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository JetXu-LLM/DocMason (135 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 916 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

openkb-deck-neon

A skill for creating a single-file HTML slide deck from content stored in OpenKB, a knowledge-base chat system. It defines a dark, high-tech visual style using neon colors, glow effects, and glass-like panels.

VectifyAI/OpenKB · 173 tokens

openkb-deck-editorial

A tool for creating a single-file HTML slide presentation from compiled knowledge-base content. Its visual style uses a warm cream background, serif typography, and brick-red accents.

VectifyAI/OpenKB · 117 tokens

openkb-html-critic

Use to review a generated HTML deck or single-page artifact for visual quality and structural correctness. Especially good at catching CSS specificity bugs where slide-modifier classes (.divider, .center, .q, .flow etc.) accidentally override the base .slide{display:none} and cause one slide to stack on top of every…

VectifyAI/OpenKB · 132 tokens

transformer-attention

Use when reasoning about Transformer self-attention, multi-head attention, positional encoding, masked decoder attention, or why attention replaced recurrence/convolutions in sequence models; not for generic NLP or unrelated attention topics.

VectifyAI/OpenKB · 46 tokens

release-sync

Syncs latest release content to NotebookLM and HQ Knowledge Base after version tagging. Reads CHANGELOG, CLAUDE.md, and hook README, updates notebook sources, and ingests release digest. Optionally generates podcast from updated knowledge base. Use after tagging a new version to propagate release knowledge.

yonatangross/orchestkit · 62 tokens

openlore

Query and publish to an OpenLore knowledge base over SSH using ordinary shell commands. Use when a task needs project documentation, runbooks, shared team knowledge, or a place to publish findings.

aakarim/OpenLore · 42 tokens