Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jezweb/vite-flare-starter --skill routine-health-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jezweb/vite-flare-starterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jezweb/vite-flare-starter/routine-health-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jezweb/vite-flare-starter/routine-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jezweb/vite-flare-starter/routine-health-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jezweb/vite-flare-starter/routine-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jezweb/vite-flare-starter/routine-health-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00609 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00304 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00122 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
routine-health-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Routine Health Check
Purpose
Routines run unattended. When one of them starts erroring or running away on cost, the user needs to know — but only via the same channels they already check (the Inbox), not a separate alerting layer.
This skill turns "watch the other routines" into a routine itself. It loads into a daily fire of AssistantAgent and produces findings.
What you check
For each routine the user owns:
- Error rate — count of
routine_runs.outcome IN ('error', 'budget_exceeded')in the last 24h vs total runs in 24h. > 30% = high importance. - Drift — has the agent stopped emitting findings (no inbox_add calls for N consecutive runs)? That suggests the routine is silently doing nothing.
- Cost spike — sum
routine_runs.cost_usdover 24h vs the routine's daily cap. ≥ 80% = high importance. - Stuck runs — outcome='started' for > 1h means the run never finished cleanly.
What you produce
For each issue, call inbox_add with:
{
"kind": "routine_health",
"summary": "<routine name> — <one-line issue + action>",
"importance": "<calibrate via score-importance skill>",
"reasoning": "<the numbers backing the claim>",
"suggestedAction": {
"label": "Open routine",
"link": "/dashboard/routines/<id>"
},
"tags": ["routine-health"],
"relatedItemIds": ["<routineId>"]
}
Scope rules
- Don't emit findings for routines the user has explicitly disabled — they already chose to stop them.
- Don't emit a finding for routine-health itself (that's recursive — and you'd cause exactly the noise you're checking for).
- Don't emit duplicate findings — if you've reported this routine in the last 24h, skip unless the metric got materially worse.
Tone
Findings are read while the user is doing other things. Lead with the routine name + the actionable bit, never with technical detail. Detail goes in reasoning.
Examples:
- ✓
Stuck-tickets sweeper — 4 of 6 fires errored (Gmail token expired). Reconnect Gmail. - ✗
routine_runs WHERE outcome='error' returned 4 rows for routine_id=abc...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 61 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 7cf5b9ab51da
routine-health-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository jezweb/vite-flare-starter (48 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 609 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…