Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to jgiox/goodvibes. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jgiox/goodvibes/main/.claude/skills/goodvibes-hygiene/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jgiox/goodvibesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jgiox/goodvibes/goodvibes-hygiene)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jgiox/goodvibes/goodvibes-hygiene"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jgiox/goodvibes/goodvibes-hygiene/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jgiox/goodvibes/goodvibes-hygiene"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jgiox/goodvibes/goodvibes-hygiene.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00117 | $0.00558 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00047 | $0.00223 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
goodvibes-hygiene scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
goodvibes hygiene
Ponytail rules are already always-on in your CLAUDE.md. These commands add explicit on-demand audits.
Setup
Using Cursor, Windsurf, Kiro, Copilot, Antigravity, Amazon Q, Cline, Continue.dev, Devin Desktop, or another IDE? The minimalism rules are already embedded in your project's IDE rule file (
.cursor/rules/goodvibes.mdc,GEMINI.md,.windsurfrules,.kiro/steering/goodvibes.md,AGENTS.md,.clinerules/goodvibes.md,.amazonq/rules/goodvibes.md,.continue/rules/goodvibes.md,.devin/rules/goodvibes.md) and activate automatically — no plugin setup needed. The/ponytail-reviewand/ponytail-auditcommands below are Claude Code CLI terminal only and are not available in other IDEs.
Ponytail commands require the ponytail plugin. Install it in Claude Code CLI terminal:
/plugin marketplace add DietrichGebert/ponytail
/plugin install ponytail@ponytail
(Desktop app: Customize → + by personal plugins → Create plugin → Add from repository →
enter https://github.com/DietrichGebert/ponytail)
Commands
/ponytail-review— Review the current diff for over-engineering. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it./ponytail-audit— Scan the entire repo for unnecessary complexity. Ranked list, biggest cut first.
What the always-on rules already do
Every response already applies the ponytail decision ladder (from your CLAUDE.md): simplest solution that works, stdlib before custom code, deletion before addition. The commands above are for explicit audit reports — use them when you want a structured review, not just session behavior.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines cbcd0ea0bf8f
- 1mo ago First seen · 43 lines · 117 tokens per session scan A c06b9882ab81
goodvibes-hygiene is a skill published in the GitHub repository jgiox/goodvibes (5 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 117 tokens to every session and 558 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…