Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode --skill cleangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/clean)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/clean"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/clean/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/clean"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/clean.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.01553 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00776 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00311 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00155 |
Grade A, and why
afc:clean scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/afc:clean — Pipeline Cleanup
Runs the clean phase independently: artifact cleanup, dead code scan, CI verification, memory update, and pipeline flag release. Equivalent to Phase 5 of
/afc:auto. Use after manually running spec/plan/implement/review phases.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS— (optional) Feature name to clean up. Defaults to the currently active pipeline feature.
Prerequisites
- Pipeline must be active (
afc_state_is_active) OR a feature name must be provided - If pipeline is active, the current phase should be
reviewor later
Execution Steps
1. Resolve Feature
"${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/afc-pipeline-manage.sh" phase clean
- If pipeline is active: read feature from state
- If
$ARGUMENTSprovides a feature name: use that (for manual cleanup without active pipeline) - If neither: exit with error —
"No active pipeline and no feature specified. Usage: /afc:clean [feature-name]"
Set PIPELINE_ARTIFACT_DIR = .claude/afc/specs/{feature}/
2. Artifact Cleanup (scope-limited)
- Delete only the
.claude/afc/specs/{feature}/directory created by the current pipeline - If other
.claude/afc/specs/subdirectories exist, do not delete them (only inform the user of their existence) - Do not leave pipeline intermediate artifacts in the codebase
3. Dead Code Scan
Prefer external tooling over LLM judgment for dead code detection:
- Run
{config.gate}/{config.ci}— most linters detect unused imports/variables automatically - If the project has dedicated dead code tools (e.g.,
eslint --rule 'no-unused-vars',ts-prune,knip), use them first - Only fall back to LLM-based scan for detection that static tools cannot cover (e.g., unused exports across module boundaries)
- Remove empty directories from moved/deleted files
- Detect unused exports (re-exports of moved code from original locations etc.)
4. Final CI Gate
- Run
{config.ci}final execution - Auto-fix on failure (max 2 attempts)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 131 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A c01f2dfebb7f
afc:clean is a skill published in the GitHub repository jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,553 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
eval-agents
Audit Claude Code agents defined in .claude/agents/ for description specificity, model tier appropriateness, tools scoping, and system prompt quality. Detects dispatch ambiguity between agents, flags over-permissive tool grants, and checks for human-in-the-loop patterns that break programmatic orchestration. Use when…
land-and-deploy
Merge PR, wait for CI, verify deploy, run canary. The complete landing pipeline.
self-assessment
Interactive skill assessment with personalized learning path generation.
orchestrator-lanes
A file-based project-management playbook for a specific Claude Code development orchestrator. It organizes work into lanes, plans, dependency steps, validation phases, and shipping stages.
git-ai-archaeology
Analyze AI config evolution in a git repo. Use when mapping AI adoption history, finding when configs were first introduced, charting commit velocity by month, or identifying maturity phases in a project's AI tooling.
investigate
Systematic root-cause debugging: find the cause before writing any fix.