Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.02091 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01045 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00418 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00209 |
Grade B, and why
afc:review scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
!`cat .claude/afc.config.md 2>/dev/null || echo "[CONFIG NOT FOUND] .claude/afc.config.md not found. Create it with /afc:init."` How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/afc:review — Code Review
Performs a comprehensive review of changed code (quality, security, performance, architecture compliance). Validates completeness of the review itself with convergence-based Critic Loop.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS— (optional) Review scope (file path, PR number, or "staged")- If not specified: full
git diffof current branch (unstaged + staged)
- If not specified: full
Project Config (auto-loaded)
!cat .claude/afc.config.md 2>/dev/null || echo "[CONFIG NOT FOUND] .claude/afc.config.md not found. Create it with /afc:init."
Config Load
Always read .claude/afc.config.md first — needed for CI Commands (YAML).
Architecture, Code Style, and Project Context are auto-loaded via .claude/rules/afc-project.md.
If config file is missing:
- Ask: "
.claude/afc.config.mdnot found. Run/afc:init?" - If user accepts → run
/afc:init, then restart with original$ARGUMENTS - If user declines → abort
Execution Steps
1. Collect Review Targets
- Determine scope:
$ARGUMENTS= file path → that file only$ARGUMENTS= PR number →gh pr diff {number}$ARGUMENTS= "staged" →git diff --cached- Not specified →
git diff HEAD
- Extract changed file list; read full content of each file (not just the diff)
- Load spec context (if available):
.claude/afc/specs/{feature}/context.mdandspec.md. If neither exists, skip SPEC_ALIGNMENT with note "no spec artifacts available" - Build Impact Map — see Reverse Impact Analysis
2. Parallel Review (scaled by file count)
Assess complexity holistically: total diff size, file complexity, change diversity, and whether changes are localized or cross-cutting.
Pre-scan for parallel batch / swarm: Before distributing files, collect cross-boundary context — outbound calls between changed files with function signature + 1-line side-effect summary. Include Impact Map. Provide each agent a ## Cross-File Context block. Skip pre-scan for Direct mode.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 198 lines · 19 tokens per session scan B 6b8c6a1f4789
afc:review is a skill published in the GitHub repository jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 2,091 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (reads agent configuration directories). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
audit-agents-skills
Audit Claude Code agents, skills, and commands for quality and production readiness. Use when evaluating skill quality, checking production readiness scores, or comparing agents against best-practice templates.
design-patterns
Detect, suggest, and evaluate GoF design patterns in TypeScript/JavaScript codebases. Use when refactoring code, applying singleton/factory/observer/strategy patterns, reviewing pattern quality, or finding stack-native alternatives for React, Angular, NestJS, and Vue.
pr-triage
4-phase PR backlog management with audit, deep code review, validated comments, and optional worktree setup. Use when triaging pull requests, catching up on pending code reviews, or managing a backlog of open PRs. Args: 'all' to review all, PR numbers to focus (e.g. '42 57'), 'en'/'fr' for language, no arg = audit…
eval-skills
Audit all skills in the current project for frontmatter completeness, effort level appropriateness, allowed-tools scoping, and content quality. Produces a scored report with effort-level recommendations for each skill. Use when onboarding to a new project, reviewing skill quality before shipping, or adding effort…
review-pr
Perform a comprehensive code review of a pull request.
sonarqube
Analyze SonarCloud quality issues for a specific PR.