Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode --skill tasksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/tasks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/tasks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/tasks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode/tasks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.01251 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00626 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00250 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00125 |
Grade A, and why
afc:tasks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/afc:tasks — Task Decomposition
Generates an executable task list (tasks.md) from plan.md. Validates coverage with a convergence-based Critic Loop.
Note: In
/afc:auto, task generation runs automatically at implement start. Use this command only for standalone manual control.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS— (optional) additional constraints or priority directives
Config Load
Read .claude/afc.config.md first. If missing: print ".claude/afc.config.md not found. Run /afc:init first." then abort.
Execution Steps
1. Load Context
From .claude/afc/specs/{feature}/:
- plan.md (required) — if missing: "Run /afc:plan first."
- spec.md (required), research.md (if present)
Extract from plan.md: phase breakdown, File Change Map, architecture decisions.
2. Decompose Tasks
Task Format
- [ ] T{NNN} {[P]} {[US*]} {description} `{file path}` {depends: [TXXX, ...]}
| Component | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
T{NNN} |
Yes | 3-digit sequential ID |
[P] |
No | Mandatory parallel execution — no file overlap with other [P] tasks in same phase |
[US*] |
No | User Story label from spec.md |
description |
Yes | Verb-first clear description |
`file path` |
Yes | Primary target file |
depends: |
No | Blocking dependency list |
Phase Structure
# Tasks: {feature name}
## Phase 1: Setup — type definitions, configuration
## Phase 2: Core — business logic, store, API
## Phase 3: UI — components, interactions
## Phase 4: Integration & Polish — error handling, optimization
Decomposition Rules
- 1 task = 1 file (where possible)
- Same file → sequential; different files →
[P]candidate [P]is mandatory, not optional — once marked, task MUST run in parallel- Validate
[P]file overlaps: run"${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/afc-parallel-validate.sh" .claude/afc/specs/{feature}/tasks.md - Validate DAG (no cycles): run
"${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/afc-dag-validate.sh" .claude/afc/specs/{feature}/tasks.md— abort if cycle detected - Include a verification task per testable unit
- Add
{config.gate}validation task at end of each Phase - No over-decomposition: skip separate tasks for single-line changes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 130 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A b8c648a17703
afc:tasks is a skill published in the GitHub repository jhlee0409/all-for-claudecode (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,251 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
eval-agents
Audit Claude Code agents defined in .claude/agents/ for description specificity, model tier appropriateness, tools scoping, and system prompt quality. Detects dispatch ambiguity between agents, flags over-permissive tool grants, and checks for human-in-the-loop patterns that break programmatic orchestration. Use when…
land-and-deploy
Merge PR, wait for CI, verify deploy, run canary. The complete landing pipeline.
self-assessment
Interactive skill assessment with personalized learning path generation.
orchestrator-lanes
A file-based project-management playbook for a specific Claude Code development orchestrator. It organizes work into lanes, plans, dependency steps, validation phases, and shipping stages.
git-ai-archaeology
Analyze AI config evolution in a git repo. Use when mapping AI adoption history, finding when configs were first introduced, charting commit velocity by month, or identifying maturity phases in a project's AI tooling.
investigate
Systematic root-cause debugging: find the cause before writing any fix.