Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jianshuo/claude-skills --skill wjs-evaling-voicedrop-promptsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jianshuo/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jianshuo/claude-skills/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jianshuo/claude-skills/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jianshuo/claude-skills/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jianshuo/claude-skills/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jianshuo/claude-skills/wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00136 | $0.00823 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00054 | $0.00329 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00165 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
VoiceDrop 挖矿 prompt 评估
harness = 本 skill（协议）+ jianshuo.dev agent/eval/（脚本/数据）。运行时 = 本地 Claude Code。
被测对象 = agent/src/prompts/mine.js 的 MINE_SYSTEM（git 即版本库）。
何时用
用户改了挖矿 prompt（MINE_SYSTEM），想用数据判断改好了还是改坏了，而不是凭感觉看一两次。
流程（按序）
- 拿候选 prompt：把候选版
MINE_SYSTEM文本写到一个临时文件（如/tmp/cand-prompt.txt）；冠军 = 当前mine.js的MINE_SYSTEM（脚本自动读）。 - 跑产出：
cd ~/code/jianshuo.dev/agent && CLAUDE_API_KEY=$CLAUDE_API_KEY node eval/run-eval.mjs /tmp/cand-prompt.txt <runId>。产出落eval/runs/<runId>/。先看终端有没有「确定性回退」警告——有就先停，多半是候选 prompt 破坏了 JSON 输出。 - 成对盲评：对每条 fixture，dispatch 一个 subagent，喂
references/judge-rubric.md+ 该 fixture 的 transcript + 两份产出。A/B 顺序随机（一半 fixture 把 candidate 放 A、一半放 B，记录映射，收到结果后还原成 champion/candidate）。裁判模型用与生成（opus）不同家族的模型。收每条的{winner, dims, reason}。 - 聚合：把还原后的
verdicts（winner ∈ candidate/champion/tie）+ 候选 proxyFails 喂aggregate()，渲染renderReport()→ 写eval/runs/<runId>/report.md。 - 人工终审：把胜负最接近、分歧最大的 1–2 条产出并排摆给用户。机器只筛掉明显更差的，文风最后一票是用户。
- 晋级：仅当
decision==="promote"（胜率 ≥70% 且无回退）且用户点「认可」——把候选写回agent/src/prompts/mine.js的MINE_SYSTEM，commit（message 附 runId 与胜率），并跑npm test确认没破坏。否则保留报告、不动生产版。
边界
- 只评挖矿 prompt（
MINE_SYSTEM/MINE_SYSTEM_FORCE）。审核/语音编辑 prompt 是不同 eval 模式，不在本 skill。 - 不测成本/缓存/延迟（本地缓存行为≠生产）；不做无人值守。
- 真实金标集要 ≥10 条才可信（见
agent/eval/fixtures/README.md的补充流程）；种子 2 条只够自测流程。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 136 tokens per session scan A a3615d97ccbe
wjs-evaling-voicedrop-prompts is a skill published in the GitHub repository jianshuo/claude-skills (137 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 136 tokens to every session and 823 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt-regression-suite
Design a regression test suite that catches an LLM feature getting worse when the prompt, model, or context changes. Use when asked to stop prompt changes breaking production, set up golden tests or CI gates for an LLM feature, or test a model/prompt upgrade before shipping it. Produces a golden case set, per-case…
maplibre-running-evals
The step-by-step procedure for running this repo's Promptfoo evals with a generator and a judge over provider APIs. Use when starting a new skill and needing a baseline before writing content, when a run stalls or returns no data, when a provider rate-limits, or when deciding whether an edit needs a retest.
testing-dbt-models
Adds schema tests and data quality validation to dbt models. Use when working with dbt tests for: (1) Adding or modifying tests in schema.yml files (2) Task mentions "test", "validate", "data quality", "unique", "notnull", or "acceptedvalues" (3) Ensuring data integrity - primary keys, foreign keys, relationships (4)…
eval-llm-judge
Write LLM-as-judge evaluator prompts for AI products. Use this skill whenever you need to evaluate semantic properties of AI outputs that cannot be checked programmatically — output quality, tone, factual accuracy, edge case handling, reference alignment. Also use when auditing existing judge prompts for bias…
eval-code
Write deterministic, code-based evaluator functions for an AI product. Use this skill whenever you need to write evaluators that check structural properties of AI outputs (format, count, presence, schema compliance) without calling another LLM. Also use when auditing existing code-based evaluators for brittleness…
prompt-testing
Use when comparing two prompt variants, defining quality/efficiency/robustness metrics, or deciding whether to adopt a challenger prompt over a baseline.