Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add JiaWeiXie/swarm-pi-code-plugin --skill swarm-pi-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JiaWeiXie/swarm-pi-code-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jiaweixie/swarm-pi-code-plugin/swarm-pi-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jiaweixie/swarm-pi-code-plugin/swarm-pi-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jiaweixie/swarm-pi-code-plugin/swarm-pi-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jiaweixie/swarm-pi-code-plugin/swarm-pi-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jiaweixie/swarm-pi-code-plugin/swarm-pi-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.00411 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00205 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00082 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00041 |
Grade A, and why
swarm-pi-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review With Pi
Follow the Skill Control Loop.
- Select
--scope working-treefor local changes or--scope branch --base <ref>for a branch. Useautoonly when the intended diff is unambiguous. - Set
$PROFILE=leanfor simplify, over-engineering, deletion, reuse, stdlib, native-platform, YAGNI, clarify, or shrink requests; otherwise set$PROFILE=standard. - Run
$RUNNER review --host "$HOST" --role reviewer --scope "$SCOPE" --review-profile "$PROFILE" --execution-mode "$EXECUTION_MODE" --approval-mode "$APPROVAL_MODE" --json, adding--basewhen required. - For
lean, require three candidate perspectives followed by independent validation of at most six candidates with at most three concurrent validators. Publish onlysupportedsimplifications; inconclusive validation cannot produceLean already. Ship.. - Continue every non-terminal result through the control loop. Active Host review is limited to eligible public read-only context inside the immutable snapshot.
- Complete only when every published finding is confirmed in the actual diff and includes impact, tight file and line evidence, the failure or complexity scenario, and the smallest safe fix or verification. State explicitly when no actionable finding remains.
Pi output is evidence to validate. The workflow remains read-only.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 27 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A 563e55bc4af0
swarm-pi-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository JiaWeiXie/swarm-pi-code-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 411 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-check
PR review compliance: fetch review comments from an open PR, categorize as resolved/unresolved/dismissed, critically evaluate fixable items, implement approved fixes, and reply inline. Pass --unattended to halt on human-judgment items (emitted as Pending-Human) instead of prompting via AskUserQuestion.
babysit
PR babysitter: monitors CI status, auto-rebases when behind, auto-fixes CI where possible, delegates review comment handling to dlc:pr-check, and re-requests review after fixes. Designed for /loop usage with Remote Control.
git-ops
Git hygiene: clean up merged branches, prune stale remotes, and verify repository state.
review-team
A multi-reviewer code review process that checks a change from several specialist viewpoints and combines the results into one report. It can cover bugs, security, tests, dependencies, frontend behavior, and continuous-integration workflows.
pr-from-stale-branch-silently-reverts-newer-main-files
Trap: merging a PR whose branch carries an OLD TREE silently DELETES (reverts) files that landed on main after that tree was built — with NO merge conflict to warn you, because a deletion your own commit records is not a conflict. Use when: (1) about to gh pr create or squash-merge from a long-lived / earlier-branched…
parallel-pr-scope-overlap-tiebreaker-delta-check
Before applying a handoff prompt's tiebreaker default ("merge the first-mover", "the clean-against-main one", "the one with reviewer APPROVE") to pick a winner between two parallel PRs that implemented the SAME scope, run gh pr diff on BOTH and audit for substantive deltas. Use when: (1) a session prompt or handoff…