Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jimmypaolini/codebase/codependix-configurenpx skills add JimmyPaolini/codebase --skill codependix-configuregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JimmyPaolini/codebaseWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00111 | $0.01864 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00056 | $0.00932 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00373 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00186 |
Grade A, and why
codependix-configure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writing a codependix configuration
Codependix produces nothing until a configuration tells it what to export and
where. Every field is optional, and a workspace with no configuration file
resolves every graph type for every project to target: "none" — a successful
run that writes nothing. The configuration is the whole control surface; there
is no flag that selects a graph type.
import { type CodependixConfiguration } from "@codependix/configuration";
const codependixConfiguration: CodependixConfiguration = {
defaults: {
imports: { markdown: { anchor: "codependix-imports" }, target: "markdown" },
nestjs: { markdown: { anchor: "codependix-nestjs" }, target: "markdown" },
nx: { markdown: { anchor: "codependix-nx" }, target: "markdown" },
},
exclude: ["fixtures/**"],
include: ["**"],
projects: {
widgets: {
nx: {
json: { path: "output/nx-graph.json" },
markdown: { anchor: "codependix-nx", path: "docs/architecture.md" },
target: "both",
},
},
},
workspace: {
nx: { markdown: { anchor: "codependix-workspace" }, target: "markdown" },
},
};
export default codependixConfiguration;
Where the file is found
codependix.config.{ts,mts,cts,js,mjs,cjs,json} is searched for upward
from the run's directory, and the first file found wins outright — nothing from
a further ancestor is merged into it. A workspace carrying both a TypeScript
and a JSON file gets the TypeScript one.
Two paths behave differently on purpose:
- A path given with
--configmust exist. A typo fails the run rather than quietly resolving every graph to"none". It is resolved against the working directory first, then against the workspace root, so a configuration kept in aconfiguration/folder can be named relative to either. - An absent configuration is legal. A workspace that never wrote one is not told to; it simply exports nothing.
defaults, never default
The field that applies to every project naming no override of its own is
spelled defaults. A configuration module's default export is unwrapped by
name while loading, so a field called default would collide with that
unwrapping. A configuration that writes default: is not rejected — unknown
keys are stripped rather than refused, so a newer configuration still loads
under an older codependix — it simply has no effect at all, which reads exactly
like a tool that ignored it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 188 lines · 111 tokens per session scan A ac50f727a2c9
codependix-configure is a skill published in the GitHub repository JimmyPaolini/codebase (0 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 111 tokens to every session and 1,864 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…