Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jjhbrams/project-amber/orchestratenpx skills add JJHbrams/Project-AMBER --skill orchestrategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JJHbrams/Project-AMBERWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jjhbrams/project-amber/orchestrate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jjhbrams/project-amber/orchestrate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jjhbrams/project-amber/orchestrate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00075 | $0.00789 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
orchestrate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Orchestrate
The root session is the only delegation and integration point. Use the available planner,
coder, and servant roles; provider model IDs are runtime-specific and are not a reason to
change this behavioral flow.
Phase 0 — Triage and contract
Classify the request. Handle a simple isolated edit or read-only answer directly. For a multi-step task, capture the original request as an acceptance contract before implementation. Ask the user only about a material ambiguity that cannot be safely discovered.
Each [PLAN] criterion must contain:
acceptance_criteria:
- id: AC1
criterion: <requirement>
user_visible_outcome: <what the user can observe>
intended_runtime: <runtime, or "static-only">
verification: <how it will be checked>
evidence: <expected artifact or command result>
critical: true|false
Phase 1 — Plan
Ask planner for a read-only [PLAN]. Use servant first only when focused repository facts
are needed. Resolve material open_questions before execution. The plan may use only the
existing planner, coder, and servant roles.
Phase 2 — Plan gate and scope control
Check that every original-request outcome has a criterion, intended runtime, and verification. If a proposed action would delete, reduce, substitute, or omit verification of a criterion, emit:
[SCOPE_DELTA]
affected_criteria: <ids>
change: <delete|reduce|substitute|skip-verification>
reason: <why>
impact: <user-visible consequence>
Do not execute a material scope delta until the user explicitly approves it. Return an
incomplete plan to planner for revision rather than silently calling it an MVP.
Phase 3 — Execute
Dispatch each bounded implementation step to coder; dispatch discovery or mechanical work to
servant. Give each agent its files, constraints, acceptance-criterion IDs, and expected
evidence. Parallelize only independent work. Require coder to report actual commands and
criterion-level evidence, with unrun checks marked UNVERIFIED.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 91 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A e20590804cad
orchestrate is a skill published in the GitHub repository JJHbrams/Project-AMBER (2 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 789 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
implement
End-to-end workflow for taking MCP work items from backlog to merged PR. Handles git branching, schema-driven planning, implementation, independent review, and PR creation. Composes spec-quality, review-quality, and schema-workflow skills into a single pipeline. Use when a user says "implement this", "work on this…
ralph
Launcher for the Ralph-style queue drain script — emits the right node ralph-loop.mjs invocation based on the user's filter and bounds. The actual loop runs as a Node script that spawns one claude -p --worktree per iteration; this skill is the configurator, not the loop. Use when a user says: drain the backlog, ralph…
review-proposals
Triages pending improvement-proposal MCP items — presents each with its scope and evidence, collects an accept/reject/defer decision per proposal, and carries out the disposition: project-scoped acceptances get their exact YAML applied to .taskorchestrator/config.yaml and pushed per-root; global acceptances get a…
work-summary
Generates a project dashboard from MCP work items. Default is a lean, attention-first view: what's in flight, what's blocked, what to do next, what's queued. Use when the user says: project status, what's active, show me the dashboard, work summary, what should I work on, project health, what's blocked, where did I…
adopt-project-scope
Migrates an already-populated, unscoped Task Orchestrator database in place to the project-scoping convention — creates a project anchor root, re-parents existing work trees under it, and writes rootId back to config.yaml. Use when a user says: adopt project scope, migrate this database to project scoping, make this…
manage-schemas
Creates, views, edits, deletes, and validates note schemas for the MCP Task Orchestrator in .taskorchestrator/config.yaml — the templates that define which notes agents must fill at each workflow phase. Also recommends schema designs from a library of workflow patterns (autonomous coding loops, spec-driven teams…