Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jjmartres/ai-coding-agents --skill karpathy-guidelinesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jjmartres/ai-coding-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jjmartres/ai-coding-agents/karpathy-guidelines)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jjmartres/ai-coding-agents/karpathy-guidelines"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jjmartres/ai-coding-agents/karpathy-guidelines.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00561 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
karpathy-guidelines scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to andrej-karpathy — 72 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Karpathy Guidelines
Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes, derived from Andrej Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfalls.
Tradeoff: These guidelines bias toward caution over speed. For trivial tasks, use judgment.
1. Think Before Coding
Don't assume. Don't hide confusion. Surface tradeoffs.
Before implementing:
- State your assumptions explicitly. If uncertain, ask.
- If multiple interpretations exist, present them - don't pick silently.
- If a simpler approach exists, say so. Push back when warranted.
- If something is unclear, stop. Name what's confusing. Ask.
2. Simplicity First
Minimum code that solves the problem. Nothing speculative.
- No features beyond what was asked.
- No abstractions for single-use code.
- No "flexibility" or "configurability" that wasn't requested.
- No error handling for impossible scenarios.
- If you write 200 lines and it could be 50, rewrite it.
Ask yourself: "Would a senior engineer say this is overcomplicated?" If yes, simplify.
3. Surgical Changes
Touch only what you must. Clean up only your own mess.
When editing existing code:
- Don't "improve" adjacent code, comments, or formatting.
- Don't refactor things that aren't broken.
- Match existing style, even if you'd do it differently.
- If you notice unrelated dead code, mention it - don't delete it.
When your changes create orphans:
- Remove imports/variables/functions that YOUR changes made unused.
- Don't remove pre-existing dead code unless asked.
The test: Every changed line should trace directly to the user's request.
4. Goal-Driven Execution
Define success criteria. Loop until verified.
Transform tasks into verifiable goals:
- "Add validation" → "Write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass"
- "Fix the bug" → "Write a test that reproduces it, then make it pass"
- "Refactor X" → "Ensure tests pass before and after"
For multi-step tasks, state a brief plan:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 72 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 20592a9d25b5
karpathy-guidelines is a skill published in the GitHub repository jjmartres/ai-coding-agents (45 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 561 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to andrej-karpathy, differing in 72 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cocoplus-config
CocoPlus configuration SSOT — $cocoplus sync propagates cocoplus.toml into downstream artifacts; $cocoplus migrate-config converts legacy safety-config.json. Invoked via $cocoplus sync and $cocoplus migrate-config.
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
design-feature
Turn a raw idea or existing feature into a designed product SPEC by completing entity, integration, role, and expectation closure. Upserts never destroy recorded decisions. Triggers: "design-feature", "design this feature", "define product scope".
plan-feature
Route designed features or issues into engineering planning and roadmap registration; undesigned work stops at design-feature. Supports --next, --from-issue, and --scaffold. Triggers: "plan-feature", "plan a feature", "plan the next roadmap feature", "create SPEC and TASKS".
product-audit
Audit the whole product across code, quality, process, docs, roadmap, and tooling. Persist one severity-ranked, F-numbered report with proposals; never fix or file work. Triggers: "product-audit", "audit the product", "full health check", "are we product-ready", "CTO review".
audit-docs
Audit cross-document coherence: docs ↔ roadmap ↔ code ↔ fix index ↔ issues. Finds drift — features in docs/ not in the roadmap (or vice versa), fix-index entries already merged/closed, broken documentation-map links, dependency cycles, artifacts in the wrong language, naming-convention violations — and reports them…