Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jkudjo/oh-my-cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00287 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00143 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
review
Invoke this skill to run a structured code review pass on changed code.
When to use
- Before merging a PR or branch
- After implementing a feature with @ralph or @autopilot
- When you want a second-opinion pass on changed code
What it does
- Reads the diff or specified files
- Reviews against this checklist:
- Correctness — does it do what it claims?
- Security — SQL injection, XSS, auth bypasses, secrets in code
- Edge cases — nulls, empty inputs, concurrent access, large inputs
- Error handling — are failures caught and handled properly?
- Tests — are new code paths covered?
- Breaking changes — does it break existing callers or contracts?
- Naming & clarity — is the intent clear without comments?
- Reports: PASS / PASS WITH NOTES / FAIL with specific line references
- Saves review summary to memory key
last-review
Example
@review "the changes to src/auth/ in this PR"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 36 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 48aed1f6abb1
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 287 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review-codex
Final-gate code review via Codex CLI (codex-5.3, xhigh). Finds bugs, security issues, and regressions before commit. No edits — findings report only.
spec-review-codex
Audit project specs for conflicts, goal drift, ambiguity, and gaps via Codex CLI (gpt-5.2, xhigh). Read-only findings report.
codex-review
Run code reviews with the Codex CLI, prioritizing bugs, regressions, security risks, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, PR review, diff review, or commit-range review via codex.
worker-reviewer-iterate
Coordinates a subagent workflow where a worker implements a development task, a code reviewer audits the result for critical errors, flaws, and optimization opportunities, and then the worker iterates to apply the reviewer’s optimization suggestions. Use when the user requests implementation or other development work…
code-simplifier
Use after implementing features to simplify and refine code for clarity, consistency, and maintainability.
attach-review-to-pr
Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API.