Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Jkudjo/oh-my-cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jkudjo/oh-my-cursor/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00287 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00115 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
review
Invoke this skill to run a structured code review pass on changed code.
When to use
- Before merging a PR or branch
- After implementing a feature with @ralph or @autopilot
- When you want a second-opinion pass on changed code
What it does
- Reads the diff or specified files
- Reviews against this checklist:
- Correctness — does it do what it claims?
- Security — SQL injection, XSS, auth bypasses, secrets in code
- Edge cases — nulls, empty inputs, concurrent access, large inputs
- Error handling — are failures caught and handled properly?
- Tests — are new code paths covered?
- Breaking changes — does it break existing callers or contracts?
- Naming & clarity — is the intent clear without comments?
- Reports: PASS / PASS WITH NOTES / FAIL with specific line references
- Saves review summary to memory key
last-review
Example
@review "the changes to src/auth/ in this PR"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 48aed1f6abb1
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Jkudjo/oh-my-cursor (1 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 287 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
sonic-review-architecture
Sonic Cursor Skill: Review Android changes against Clean Architecture, MVI, module boundaries, and project rules. Use when reviewing PRs, refactors, or asking if code follows architecture standards. Prefer sonic-review-complete for a full multi-check pass.
sonicg-review-architecture
OrbitalSonic Gemini Skill: Review Android changes against Clean Architecture, MVI, module boundaries, and project rules. Use when reviewing PRs, refactors, or asking if code follows architecture standards. Prefer sonicg-review-complete for a full multi-check pass.
sonicc-review-architecture
OrbitalSonic Claude Skill: Review Android changes against Clean Architecture, MVI, module boundaries, and project rules. Use when reviewing PRs, refactors, or asking if code follows architecture standards. Prefer sonicc-review-complete for a full multi-check pass.
sonic-review-cleanup
Sonic Cursor Skill: Review unused code/drawables, APK/AAB size (PNG→WebP, vectors), and release R8/optimization on :app only. Use for cleanup, dead resources, or app-size suggestions. Prefer sonic-review-complete for a full multi-check pass.
sonic-review-complete
Sonic Cursor Skill: Run full project/PR review — architecture, performance, security, and cleanup/app-size — into one Pass/Fail report. Use when asking for complete review, review-, or pre-merge quality gate.
sonicg-review-complete
OrbitalSonic Gemini Skill: Run full project/PR review — architecture, performance, security, and cleanup/app-size — into one Pass/Fail report. Use when asking for complete review, review-, or pre-merge quality gate.