Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jlong/quiddity --skill q-setup-approvegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jlong/quiddityWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jlong/quiddity/q-setup-approve)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jlong/quiddity/q-setup-approve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jlong/quiddity/q-setup-approve/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jlong/quiddity/q-setup-approve"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jlong/quiddity/q-setup-approve.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00597 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00239 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00119 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00060 |
Grade A, and why
q-setup-approve scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Setup /approve
You are generating a custom /approve skill for the user's project.
Required categories
This skill needs the following tools.json categories: source-control, ci, pr
Process
-
Ensure tools are configured. Check if
.quiddity/tools.jsonexists and contains thesource-control,ci, andprcategories. For any missing categories, run/q-which-toolswith those categories (e.g.,/q-which-tools source-control ci pr). -
Read the configuration. Load all available Quiddity context:
.quiddity/project.md— project structure, CI/CD configuration.quiddity/process.md— merge strategy, review requirements, post-merge workflow.quiddity/tools.json— extract thesource-control,ci, andprcategories
-
Ask skill-specific questions not covered by tools.json:
- Should the skill accept a PR number as an argument? (e.g.,
/approve 123) Or default to the current branch's PR? - What should happen after merge? (update issue status, notify, etc.)
- Should it verify that all review comments are resolved?
- Any post-merge cleanup steps? (delete local branch, pull latest, etc.)
- Should the skill accept a PR number as an argument? (e.g.,
-
Generate the skill. Write a complete
/approveSKILL.md to the project's skills directory. The generated skill should:- Accept an optional PR number argument (defaulting to current branch's PR)
- Verify all CI checks pass
- Verify no unresolved review comments (if configured)
- Verify required approvals are met
- Perform the merge using the configured strategy (squash, merge, rebase)
- Update the linked issue status (e.g., move to "Done" or "Shipped")
- Clean up the branch if configured
- Report clearly if anything blocks the merge
- Reference
.quiddity/tools.jsonfor all tool-specific configuration
-
Show the generated skill to the user and ask for confirmation before finalizing.
Generated skill template
The generated /approve skill should follow this general structure, adapted
to the user's specific tools:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 4ccd9681ff70
q-setup-approve is a skill published in the GitHub repository jlong/quiddity (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 597 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…