Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill aiwg-regenerate-opencodegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwgWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-opencode)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-opencode"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-opencode/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-opencode"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/aiwg-regenerate-opencode.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.01000 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
aiwg-regenerate-opencode scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 136 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Regenerate OpenCode Context
Regenerate the .opencode/context.md file for OpenCode integration. Performs an intelligent merge — preserving team-written content while updating AIWG context.
Core Principle
Team content is preserved. AIWG content is updated. Hook file approach used when supported.
Parameters
| Flag | Description |
|---|---|
--no-backup |
Skip creating backup file |
--dry-run |
Preview changes without writing |
--full-inject |
Inject full content directly into context.md (legacy/compatibility mode) |
--migrate |
Migrate existing full-injection to hook file approach |
Hook File Approach (Default)
By default, this command uses the hook file architecture:
- Generate
AIWG-opencode.mdwith AIWG framework content - Add
@AIWG-opencode.mddirective to.opencode/context.md
Note: OpenCode's support for @file directives is not yet confirmed. If the @ directive is not supported, use --full-inject as a fallback. See #444 for status.
Execution Steps
Step 1: Create Backup
Unless --no-backup specified, create .opencode/context.md.backup-{YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS}.
Step 2: Analyze Existing Content
Read .opencode/context.md if it exists and categorize:
- Team content (PRESERVE): Project rules, conventions, business logic
- AIWG content (UPDATE): Framework integration sections
Step 3: Detect Hook File Support
Check whether existing .opencode/context.md uses a hook file directive:
grep -q "@AIWG-opencode.md" .opencode/context.md && echo "hook approach" || echo "full inject or fresh"
Step 4: Generate AIWG-opencode.md
Generate the hook file content from installed framework manifests (same as aiwg hook-regenerate --provider opencode).
If --full-inject: Skip hook file generation, embed content directly.
Step 5: Write Output
Hook approach (default):
- Write
AIWG-opencode.mdwith generated content - Update
.opencode/context.md: preserve team content + add@AIWG-opencode.mddirective
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 136 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 4fab3538e2ee
aiwg-regenerate-opencode is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmagly/aiwg (211 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,000 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
surge
Use when a user provides a PRD, spec, or detailed requirements document and needs a full project delivered through iterative expert orchestration — multi-round analyze/research/design/implement/QA cycles with convergence detection. NOT for: single-file edits, quick prototypes, simple Q&A, or tasks without a written…
goal-writer
Drafts a goal+rider document pair that briefs an autonomous coding agent on one round of work — a goal file under 4,000 characters (sized to fit the /goal command in both Claude Code and Codex) plus an unbounded rider with phased plans and named depth tests. Use when the user says "draft a goal", "write a goal+rider"…
horizon
Run a durable Horizon workflow for a multi-feature goal with bounded autonomous retries and an audit trail.
check-in
Record a Parallax protocol checkpoint with concrete evidence before gated implementation work.
debug
Perform an evidence-based Parallax diagnosis or post-build audit and verify the repair.
hyperplan
Harden a non-trivial plan through a three-round adversarial critique and evidence-based synthesis.