Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill devkit-testgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwgWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/devkit-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/devkit-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/devkit-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/devkit-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/devkit-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.01227 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00491 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
devkit-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test AIWG Package
Run comprehensive tests on an AIWG package to verify structure, functionality, and deployment readiness.
Process
1. Locate and Identify Package
Resolve the package path from $ARGUMENTS:
- If relative path, resolve from current directory
- If package name, look in addons/ and frameworks/
Identify package type from manifest.json:
"type": "addon"→ Addon tests"type": "framework"→ Framework tests"type": "extension"→ Extension tests
2. Run Structure Tests
Manifest Validation:
- manifest.json exists and is valid JSON
- Required fields present: id, type, name, version, description
- Entry paths exist and match actual directories
- Component arrays match actual files
Directory Structure:
- Expected directories exist (agents/, commands/, etc.)
- No orphaned files outside expected structure
- README.md exists and is non-empty
Component Files:
- All agents listed in manifest exist as .md files
- All commands listed in manifest exist as .md files
- All skills listed in manifest have SKILL.md
- All templates listed in manifest exist
3. Run Content Tests
Agent Validation: For each agent file:
- Valid YAML frontmatter with name, description, model, tools
- Model is valid (sonnet, opus, haiku)
- Tools list contains valid tool names
- Content sections present (Domain Expertise, Responsibilities, etc.)
Command Validation: For each command file:
- Valid YAML frontmatter with name, description
- Args defined with name and description
- Process section present
- No broken internal references
Skill Validation: For each skill:
- SKILL.md has valid frontmatter
- Trigger phrases defined
- Execution process documented
- References directory exists (if referenced)
4. Run Type-Specific Tests
Addon Tests:
- No
requiresfield (addons are standalone) - Can be deployed independently
Extension Tests:
-
requiresfield present and valid - Parent framework exists
- Located in correct extensions/ subdirectory
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 192 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A bbe182ccb6ca
devkit-test is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmagly/aiwg (224 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,227 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
attest
Verifying spec compliance: extracts ACs from specs, adversarially checks conformance, generates BDD scenarios and traceability matrices. Use when impl must be proven to match a PRD/SRS/AC.
matrix
Controlling combinatorial explosion across multi-dimensional axes: minimum coverage sets, execution plans, test/deploy/UX/risk prioritization. Use when scoping multi-axis combinations.
probe
Integrating OWASP ZAP/Burp Suite/Nuclei, planning penetration tests, executing DAST, and scanning for vulnerabilities. For runtime vulnerability validation. Complements Sentinel static analysis.
siege
Verifying system resilience via load testing, contract testing, chaos engineering, and mutation testing. Use for limit verification, non-functional testing, or reliability validation.
voyager
Authoring web and native E2E tests, including Playwright, Appium, XCUITest, device farms, visual regression, and App Store screenshot pipelines. Not for unit/load tests.
radar
Adding edge-case tests, repairing flaky tests, and improving coverage. Use when test gaps need filling or regressions need guarding. Supports JS/TS, Python, Go, Rust, and Java.