Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill doc-syncgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwgWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/doc-sync)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/doc-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/doc-sync/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/doc-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/doc-sync.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00786 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00393 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
doc-sync scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 91 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Doc Sync
Detect and resolve documentation drift without front-loading a full repository audit. Treat standard Claude Code Sonnet context as the baseline.
Triggers
Users may say:
- "doc sync"
- "sync docs"
- "fix doc drift"
- "reconcile docs"
- "update docs to match code"
- "update code to match docs"
- "check for documentation drift"
Parameters
direction is required:
code-to-docs: update docs to match codedocs-to-code: identify code gaps against docsfull: bidirectional reconciliation with human review for conflicts
Options:
--dry-run: report only, no file edits--scope <path>: limit the audit to a subtree or file group--incremental: start from changed files since the last sync, then current git changed files if no last-run record exists--parallel N: cap concurrent auditors; default2, maximum4
Artifact root resolution
Treat every .aiwg/... path below as a logical artifact path. Before reading
or writing sync state, working evidence, or reports, run aiwg artifacts path
from the active workspace and use the returned absolute directory as
AIWG_ARTIFACT_ROOT. Never write these payloads to a literal project-local
.aiwg/ when AIWG_ARTIFACTS_PATH or .aiwg-location redirects the corpus.
Context Budget Rules
- Start with
git status --short,git diff --name-only, andgit diff --cached --name-only. - If no
--scopeor--incrementalis supplied, derive a candidate scope from changed files and ask before expanding to the full repo. - Use inventories (
rg --files,find, git path lists) before reading file bodies. - Dispatch auditors only for domains implicated by the scoped files.
- Each auditor returns at most 10 findings and 600 words to the parent context.
Detailed evidence goes under
$AIWG_ARTIFACT_ROOT/working/doc-sync/. - Do not preload other skills into auditor agents.
- For combined doc-sync, blog, and commit requests, keep blog/release coverage
as one scoped lane and return a handoff summary for
commit-and-push.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 91 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A b5918c33f7ad
doc-sync is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmagly/aiwg (211 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 786 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
surge
Use when a user provides a PRD, spec, or detailed requirements document and needs a full project delivered through iterative expert orchestration — multi-round analyze/research/design/implement/QA cycles with convergence detection. NOT for: single-file edits, quick prototypes, simple Q&A, or tasks without a written…
goal-writer
Drafts a goal+rider document pair that briefs an autonomous coding agent on one round of work — a goal file under 4,000 characters (sized to fit the /goal command in both Claude Code and Codex) plus an unbounded rider with phased plans and named depth tests. Use when the user says "draft a goal", "write a goal+rider"…
horizon
Run a durable Horizon workflow for a multi-feature goal with bounded autonomous retries and an audit trail.
check-in
Record a Parallax protocol checkpoint with concrete evidence before gated implementation work.
debug
Perform an evidence-based Parallax diagnosis or post-build audit and verify the repair.
hyperplan
Harden a non-trivial plan through a three-round adversarial critique and evidence-based synthesis.