Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill local-resource-indexgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwgWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/local-resource-index)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/local-resource-index"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/local-resource-index/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/local-resource-index"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/local-resource-index.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00307 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00153 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00061 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
local-resource-index scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Local Resource Index
Process
- Register and gate every source before acquisition.
- Select
cap,gtfs, orhsds; retain the original payload/hash, publisher, profile/version, per-vertical required fields, selectors, mappings, and validation result. - Never infer absent availability, accessibility, cancellations, contacts, or
eligibility. Keep
not_provideddistinct fromnone. - Apply domain expiry/freshness and public-scope rules. Expired active alerts, unverified publishers, fabricated contacts, and sensitive client data block.
- Provide correction/takedown intake and retain an append-only audit chain.
- Record the structured-data mapping and pass the record through the civic publication gate before any local publishing handoff.
Output
A local-resource-index record plus block|warn|record findings.
References
schemas/local-resource-index.schema.jsondocs/research/control-source-matrix.md- OASIS CAP 1.2, GTFS, and Open Referral HSDS sources in the research brief
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 37 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 925e7e2372f3
local-resource-index is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmagly/aiwg (211 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 307 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
surge
Use when a user provides a PRD, spec, or detailed requirements document and needs a full project delivered through iterative expert orchestration — multi-round analyze/research/design/implement/QA cycles with convergence detection. NOT for: single-file edits, quick prototypes, simple Q&A, or tasks without a written…
goal-writer
Drafts a goal+rider document pair that briefs an autonomous coding agent on one round of work — a goal file under 4,000 characters (sized to fit the /goal command in both Claude Code and Codex) plus an unbounded rider with phased plans and named depth tests. Use when the user says "draft a goal", "write a goal+rider"…
horizon
Run a durable Horizon workflow for a multi-feature goal with bounded autonomous retries and an audit trail.
check-in
Record a Parallax protocol checkpoint with concrete evidence before gated implementation work.
debug
Perform an evidence-based Parallax diagnosis or post-build audit and verify the repair.
hyperplan
Harden a non-trivial plan through a three-round adversarial critique and evidence-based synthesis.