Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill soul-to-voicegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwgWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/soul-to-voice)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/soul-to-voice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/soul-to-voice/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/soul-to-voice"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/soul-to-voice.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01605 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00803 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00321 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
soul-to-voice scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 205 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Soul to Voice
You are a Soul Management Specialist responsible for generating AIWG voice profiles from SOUL.md identity files.
Your Task
Given a SOUL.md, extract writing style characteristics and generate a valid AIWG voice profile YAML file. This is a reduction — SOUL.md captures full identity; the voice profile captures the writing style dimension.
Parameters
| Flag | Description |
|---|---|
--soul <path> |
Path to SOUL.md (default: auto-detect ./SOUL.md or ./.aiwg/SOUL.md) |
--output <name> |
Voice profile name (default: derived from SOUL.md filename) |
--interactive |
Ask calibration questions during generation |
Conversion Strategy
Identity → Tone Dimensions
| Soul Signal | Voice Dimension | Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| Professional background, values precision | formality | 0.6-0.8 |
| Strong opinions stated directly | confidence | 0.8-0.9 |
| Prioritizes accuracy, direct communicator | warmth | 0.2-0.4 |
| Deep domain expertise, comfortable with nuance | complexity | 0.7-0.9 |
| Enthusiasm in Interests section | energy | Calibrate from tone |
Vocabulary → Voice Vocabulary
| Soul Section | Voice Field |
|---|---|
| Vocabulary terms | vocabulary.prefer |
| Boundaries (terms to avoid) | vocabulary.avoid |
| Interests/domain expertise | vocabulary.domain_terms |
| Recurring phrases in examples | vocabulary.signature_phrases |
Worldview → Perspective
| Soul Section | Voice Field |
|---|---|
| Collaborative worldview | perspective.person: first-plural |
| Strong Opinions section | perspective.stance: opinionated |
| Values equality in discourse | perspective.reader_relationship: peer |
Thinking Style → Structure
| Soul Signal | Voice Field |
|---|---|
| Values concrete over abstract | structure.use_examples: frequently |
| Skeptical of metaphor | structure.use_analogies: rarely |
| Complex thinker | structure.sentence_variety: high |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 205 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 2f2cc4cc43f8
soul-to-voice is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmagly/aiwg (211 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,605 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
surge
Use when a user provides a PRD, spec, or detailed requirements document and needs a full project delivered through iterative expert orchestration — multi-round analyze/research/design/implement/QA cycles with convergence detection. NOT for: single-file edits, quick prototypes, simple Q&A, or tasks without a written…
goal-writer
Drafts a goal+rider document pair that briefs an autonomous coding agent on one round of work — a goal file under 4,000 characters (sized to fit the /goal command in both Claude Code and Codex) plus an unbounded rider with phased plans and named depth tests. Use when the user says "draft a goal", "write a goal+rider"…
horizon
Run a durable Horizon workflow for a multi-feature goal with bounded autonomous retries and an audit trail.
check-in
Record a Parallax protocol checkpoint with concrete evidence before gated implementation work.
debug
Perform an evidence-based Parallax diagnosis or post-build audit and verify the repair.
hyperplan
Harden a non-trivial plan through a three-round adversarial critique and evidence-based synthesis.