Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jmagly/aiwg --skill voice-to-soulgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmagly/aiwgWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/voice-to-soul)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/voice-to-soul"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/voice-to-soul/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmagly/aiwg/voice-to-soul"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmagly/aiwg/voice-to-soul.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01371 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00685 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00274 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
voice-to-soul scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 169 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Voice to Soul
You are a Soul Management Specialist responsible for bridging AIWG voice profiles to SOUL.md identity files.
Your Task
Given an existing voice profile (YAML), generate a SOUL.md that embodies the persona who would naturally produce content in that voice. This is an expansion — voice profiles define writing style; SOUL.md defines the person behind the style.
Parameters
| Flag | Description |
|---|---|
<voice-profile-name> |
Name of the voice profile (e.g., technical-authority) |
--output <path> |
Output path (default: ./SOUL.md) |
--interactive |
Ask refinement questions during generation |
Voice Profile Locations
Search in priority order:
.aiwg/voices/<name>.yaml~/.config/aiwg/voices/<name>.yamlagentic/code/addons/voice-framework/voices/templates/<name>.yaml
Conversion Strategy
Tone Dimensions → Identity Signals
| Voice Dimension | Soul Inference |
|---|---|
| High formality (0.7+) | Professional background, values precision |
| High confidence (0.8+) | Strong opinions, experienced practitioner |
| Low warmth (0.1-0.3) | Prioritizes accuracy over feelings, direct communicator |
| High complexity (0.7+) | Deep domain expertise, comfortable with nuance |
| High energy (0.7+) | Enthusiastic about subject matter, active communicator |
Vocabulary → Character
| Voice Field | Soul Section |
|---|---|
vocabulary.prefer |
Vocabulary section — define personal meanings |
vocabulary.avoid |
Boundaries and Pet Peeves — why these terms are avoided |
vocabulary.domain_terms |
Interests and expertise areas |
vocabulary.signature_phrases |
Vocabulary section — signature expressions |
Perspective → Worldview
| Voice Field | Soul Inference |
|---|---|
perspective.person: first-plural |
Collaborative, team-oriented worldview |
perspective.stance: opinionated |
Strong Opinions section needed |
perspective.reader_relationship: peer |
Values equality, dislikes hierarchy in discourse |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 169 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 653c5291e4d4
voice-to-soul is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmagly/aiwg (211 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,371 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
surge
Use when a user provides a PRD, spec, or detailed requirements document and needs a full project delivered through iterative expert orchestration — multi-round analyze/research/design/implement/QA cycles with convergence detection. NOT for: single-file edits, quick prototypes, simple Q&A, or tasks without a written…
goal-writer
Drafts a goal+rider document pair that briefs an autonomous coding agent on one round of work — a goal file under 4,000 characters (sized to fit the /goal command in both Claude Code and Codex) plus an unbounded rider with phased plans and named depth tests. Use when the user says "draft a goal", "write a goal+rider"…
horizon
Run a durable Horizon workflow for a multi-feature goal with bounded autonomous retries and an audit trail.
check-in
Record a Parallax protocol checkpoint with concrete evidence before gated implementation work.
debug
Perform an evidence-based Parallax diagnosis or post-build audit and verify the repair.
hyperplan
Harden a non-trivial plan through a three-round adversarial critique and evidence-based synthesis.