Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/jmxt3/gitscape.ai/test-driven-developmentnpx skills add jmxt3/gitscape.ai --skill test-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jmxt3/gitscape.aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmxt3/gitscape.ai/test-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jmxt3/gitscape.ai/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jmxt3/gitscape.ai/test-driven-development.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00050 | $0.03289 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01644 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00658 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00329 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to test-driven-development — 23 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 380 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development
Overview
Write a failing test before writing the code that makes it pass. For bug fixes, reproduce the bug with a test before attempting a fix. Tests are proof — "seems right" is not done. A codebase with good tests is an AI agent's superpower; a codebase without tests is a liability.
When to Use
- Implementing any new logic or behavior
- Fixing any bug (the Prove-It Pattern)
- Modifying existing functionality
- Adding edge case handling
- Any change that could break existing behavior
When NOT to use: Pure configuration changes, documentation updates, or static content changes that have no behavioral impact.
Related: For browser-based changes, combine TDD with runtime verification using Chrome DevTools MCP — see the Browser Testing section below.
The TDD Cycle
RED GREEN REFACTOR
Write a test Write minimal code Clean up the
that fails ──→ to make it pass ──→ implementation ──→ (repeat)
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
Test FAILS Test PASSES Tests still PASS
Step 1: RED — Write a Failing Test
Write the test first. It must fail. A test that passes immediately proves nothing.
// RED: This test fails because createTask doesn't exist yet
describe('TaskService', () => {
it('creates a task with title and default status', async () => {
const task = await taskService.createTask({ title: 'Buy groceries' });
expect(task.id).toBeDefined();
expect(task.title).toBe('Buy groceries');
expect(task.status).toBe('pending');
expect(task.createdAt).toBeInstanceOf(Date);
});
});
Step 2: GREEN — Make It Pass
Write the minimum code to make the test pass. Don't over-engineer:
// GREEN: Minimal implementation
export async function createTask(input: { title: string }): Promise<Task> {
const task = {
id: generateId(),
title: input.title,
status: 'pending' as const,
createdAt: new Date(),
};
await db.tasks.insert(task);
return task;
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 380 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A fc76d105d467
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository jmxt3/gitscape.ai (33 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 3,289 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to test-driven-development, differing in 23 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
pw-test
Use when creating, executing, or managing Pest tests within ProcessWire or ProcessWire modules, including Test-Driven Development (TDD) tasks.
pw-writing-plans
Use when creating implementation plans from approved specifications to ensure ProcessWire-native architecture, safe migration structures, and strict test-driven task execution.
package-testing
Use this skill when writing, editing, fixing, or reviewing package tests with Pest 4/5 and Orchestra Testbench, including TDD, feature tests, unit tests, type coverage, arch tests, workbench behavior, commands, routes, config, migrations, and publishable resources.
testing-tdd
Test-Driven Development workflow and testing standards. Use when writing tests, implementing TDD, working with Vitest (frontend), xUnit or MsTest (backend), or when the user asks about testing strategies, test coverage, or TDD methodology.
tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
plan-create
Create structured implementation plans for autonomous TDD development. Use for new features, multi-file changes, or anything requiring multiple steps or tests. Triggers on aspirational openers ("let's build", "let's start building", "I want to make", "I want an app that", "help me build"), capability lists ("users…