Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jnPiyush/AgentX --skill feedback-loopsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jnPiyush/AgentXWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/feedback-loops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/feedback-loops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/feedback-loops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/feedback-loops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/feedback-loops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.02983 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01193 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00597 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00298 |
Grade A, and why
feedback-loops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 338 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Feedback Loops
Purpose: Build systems that continuously improve AI/ML models through structured human and automated feedback mechanisms.
When to Use This Skill
- Collecting and integrating user feedback into model improvement
- Implementing RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback) pipelines
- Designing reward models for preference-based training
- Building automated feedback systems (RLAIF - AI feedback)
- Creating annotation pipelines for training data refinement
- Establishing continuous improvement cycles for production AI systems
Prerequisites
- Deployed AI system with feedback collection capability
- Storage for feedback data (structured database)
- Annotation pipeline or LLM-as-judge for automated feedback
- Retraining pipeline (connects to Model Fine-Tuning skill)
Decision Tree
Setting up feedback?
+- What type of feedback?
| +- User signals (thumbs up/down, ratings)?
| -> Implicit feedback collection
| +- User corrections (edited responses)?
| -> Explicit feedback with preference pairs
| +- Expert annotations (labeled data)?
| -> Annotation pipeline
| +- Automated (LLM-as-judge)?
| -> RLAIF pipeline
+- What is the improvement goal?
| +- Alignment (safety, helpfulness)?
| -> RLHF / DPO with preference data
| +- Accuracy (factual correctness)?
| -> Curated fine-tuning data from corrections
| +- Style / format?
| -> Supervised fine-tuning on preferred outputs
| +- Coverage (new topics)?
| -> RAG index expansion from feedback gaps
+- How often to improve?
+- Continuous (online learning)? -> Real-time feedback pipeline
+- Periodic (batch retraining)? -> Scheduled feedback aggregation
+- On-demand (triggered)? -> Threshold-based retraining
Feedback Loop Architecture
Full-Cycle Pipeline
[Users / Operators]
|
v
[AI System (Inference)]
|
v
[Response + Feedback UI]
|
v
[Feedback Collection]
|
+-- [Structured Storage (DB)]
| |
| v
| [Feedback Aggregation]
| |
| v
| [Quality Filter]
| |
| v
| [Training Data Builder]
| |
| v
| [Fine-Tuning / RLHF Pipeline]
| |
| v
| [Evaluation Gate]
| |
| v
| [Model Registry]
|
+-- [Analytics Dashboard]
| |
| v
| [Insights: Failure Patterns, Gaps, Trends]
|
+-- [RAG Index Update] (if feedback reveals knowledge gaps)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 6688a4671e0e
- 1mo ago First seen · 338 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A be623be6c75d
feedback-loops is a skill published in the GitHub repository jnPiyush/AgentX (17 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,983 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.
finetuning
Fine-tune models on Microsoft Foundry using SFT (supervised), DPO (preference), or RFT (reinforcement with graders). Covers dataset preparation, training job submission, deployment, and evaluation. USE FOR: fine-tune, SFT, DPO, RFT, training data, grader, distillation, fine-tuned model, training job, large file…