Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jnPiyush/AgentX --skill model-fine-tuninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jnPiyush/AgentXWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/model-fine-tuning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/model-fine-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/model-fine-tuning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/model-fine-tuning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jnpiyush/agentx/model-fine-tuning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.02647 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.01059 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00529 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00265 |
Grade A, and why
model-fine-tuning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 282 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Model Fine-Tuning
Purpose: Adapt pre-trained foundation models to domain-specific tasks through parameter-efficient and full fine-tuning techniques.
When to Use This Skill
- Adapting an LLM to follow domain-specific instructions or style
- Improving model accuracy on specialized tasks (classification, extraction, generation)
- Reducing inference cost by distilling a large model into a smaller one
- Building training data pipelines for fine-tuning datasets
- Choosing between fine-tuning approaches (LoRA, QLoRA, full, distillation)
Prerequisites
- Base model selection (open-source or API-based)
- Training dataset (instruction pairs, labeled examples, or preference data)
- GPU compute (local or cloud)
Decision Tree
Need model customization?
+- Task-specific behavior (format, style, domain)?
| +- Small dataset (<1K examples)?
| +- Use few-shot prompting first -> Good enough? -> Done
| +- Not enough? -> LoRA fine-tuning (efficient, low data)
| +- Medium dataset (1K-50K examples)?
| +- Use LoRA or QLoRA -> Most cost-effective
| +- Large dataset (50K+ examples)?
| +- Full fine-tuning (if budget allows)
| +- Or LoRA with longer training
+- Need smaller/faster model?
| +- Knowledge distillation from large to small model
| +- Prune and quantize after fine-tuning
+- Need alignment (safety, helpfulness)?
| +- DPO (Direct Preference Optimization) on preference pairs
| +- RLHF if reward model available
+- Using API-based model (OpenAI, Azure)?
+- Use provider fine-tuning API
+- Prepare JSONL format per provider spec
Fine-Tuning Approaches
| Approach | Parameters Trained | VRAM Required | Data Needed | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full Fine-Tuning | All | Very High (80GB+) | 10K-1M+ | Maximum performance, if budget allows |
| LoRA | Low-rank adapters (0.1-1%) | Medium (16-24GB) | 1K-50K | Most common; great cost/quality tradeoff |
| QLoRA | Quantized base + LoRA | Low (8-16GB) | 1K-50K | Constrained GPU budget |
| Prefix Tuning | Soft prefix tokens | Low | 500-10K | Simple task adaptation |
| Adapter Tuning | Small adapter layers | Low-Medium | 1K-50K | Multi-task with shared base |
| Knowledge Distillation | Student model (all) | Medium | Large unlabeled + teacher | Deploying smaller models |
| DPO | Full or LoRA | Medium-High | 5K-50K preference pairs | Alignment, safety, style |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed da24ac69e084
- 1mo ago First seen · 282 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 3b7a3717ff7b
model-fine-tuning is a skill published in the GitHub repository jnPiyush/AgentX (16 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 2,647 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and designs an end-to-end governed agentic analytics solution using Knowledge Catalog and Managed Service for Apache Spark (Lightning Engine). Use when designing data science and analytics workflows across structured and unstructured distributed data (including in S3, Azure Blob, AlloyDB, and…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.
finetuning
Fine-tune models on Microsoft Foundry using SFT (supervised), DPO (preference), or RFT (reinforcement with graders). Covers dataset preparation, training job submission, deployment, and evaluation. USE FOR: fine-tune, SFT, DPO, RFT, training data, grader, distillation, fine-tuned model, training job, large file…