Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add JoaoBerne/cli-bridge-mcp --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/JoaoBerne/cli-bridge-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/joaoberne/cli-bridge-mcp/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joaoberne/cli-bridge-mcp/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joaoberne/cli-bridge-mcp/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00205 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review — cross-model diff review
Run a council review of the current changes.
- Call the
review_diffMCP tool (servercli-bridge) withcwdset to the repository root. Usebasefor a non-default base ref (e.g.main). - Findings come back merged across models with a confidence level (single/majority/consensus). Consensus findings are the ones every model saw independently — treat those as the priority list.
- Present the findings to the user grouped by confidence, with your own judgement on each (the council can be wrong; you are the editor, not a relay).
For security-sensitive changes, prefer the security_review tool — same flow,
security-focused prompts plus a residual-risk section.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 20 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 5dc81089132f
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository JoaoBerne/cli-bridge-mcp (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 205 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
cn-check
Install and run the Continue CLI (cn) to execute AI agent checks on local code changes. Use when asked to "run checks", "lint with AI", "review my changes with cn", or set up Continue CI locally.
printing-press-output-review
Internal sub-skill: agentic review of a printed CLI's sampled command output for plausibility issues that rule-based checks can't encode (substring-match relevance, format bugs, silent source drops, ranking failures). Invoked via the Skill tool by the main printing-press skill at Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish…
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
review
Validate plans, execution, or PRs against wish criteria — returns SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged gaps.
review
Adversarial fresh-context review of an increment before it ships. Every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use when saying "review", "grill this", or "critique the implementation".
architecture
Use when reviewing architecture in any codebase — module boundaries, stated design contracts, abstraction depth, error-handling design. Assess by default, apply changes on request; complexity is dependencies plus obscurity, and deep modules win.