Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins --skill rfcgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/rfc)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/rfc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/rfc/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/rfc"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins/rfc.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.02144 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00858 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00429 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00214 |
Grade A, and why
rfc scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RFC Manager
Manage architecture RFCs with 5 operations: create, review, list, update, status.
Argument Parsing
Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine the action:
| First word | Remaining args | Operation |
|---|---|---|
create |
<topic> |
Draft a new RFC |
review |
<path-to-rfc> |
Review an existing RFC |
list |
(none) | List all RFCs |
update |
<path-to-rfc> |
Update specific RFC sections |
status |
<number> <status> |
Transition RFC status with validation and side effects |
| (empty) | Ask the user which action to perform |
If the first word does not match any action, treat the entire $ARGUMENTS as a topic and default to create.
RFC Directory Discovery
Used by all operations. Search for RFC files across all convention paths (exclude *.spec.md companion files):
docs/rfcs/*.mddocs/20-architecture/rfcs/*.md(jd-docs — detected via.jd-config.jsonordocs/20-architecture/directory).arkhe/rfcs/*.md(arkhe convention)arkhe/rfcs/*.md
For create and update, resolve a write directory:
- If jd-docs detected →
docs/20-architecture/rfcs/ - Else if
docs/rfcs/exists →docs/rfcs/ - Else → create
docs/rfcs/as default
Operation: create
Draft a populated RFC — NOT a blank template. Gather context, write a spec, then write a real first draft with honest self-assessment.
- Determine topic from args after
create(or ask if empty) - Gather context — search conversation, research artifacts (
docs/30-research/,docs/50-research/,docs/research/), memory files, relevant source code, and ADRs (docs/20-architecture/22-adr/,docs/20-architecture/adr/,docs/adr/). See WORKFLOW.md for detail. - Confirm scope with user before drafting — present what you found and proposed scope. Use
AskUserQuestionfor meaningful alternatives. - Resolve number and slug — discover write directory, glob all convention paths for highest existing number, assign next (zero-padded 4 digits). Confirm title with user, generate kebab-case slug. Both spec and RFC will use
NNNN-<slug>. - Write spec file — read spec template at
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/templates/rfc-spec-template.md. Fill Problem Statement, Key Constraints, Success Criteria, and Scope Boundaries with concrete content. Write to<dir>/NNNN-<slug>.spec.md. Present to user for confirmation viaAskUserQuestion. See WORKFLOW.md for spec guidance. - Read RFC template at
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/templates/rfc-template.mdfor section structure - Draft populated RFC filling every section with substantive content. See WORKFLOW.md for per-section guidance. Set Author to git user name, Status to
Draft, Date to today. - Append Author's Notes — below Open Questions, record: shortcuts taken, unverified assumptions, areas of uncertainty, low-confidence sections. Aim for 3-8 items. Be specific — these feed the adversarial review. See WORKFLOW.md for confession guidelines.
- Write RFC to
<dir>/NNNN-<slug>.md - Suggest next steps:
/rfc review <path>for adversarial design review (uses rfc-critic agent)
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 145 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 52235980cab3
rfc is a skill published in the GitHub repository joaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-plugins (21 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 2,144 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
test-writer
Generate comprehensive tests including unit, integration, and property-based tests.
git-workflow
Git branching, commits, and PR workflow following GitFlow conventions.
pm
Universal, project-agnostic PRODUCT MANAGER playbook — the scope-disciplined PM that plans a project, gates its launch, and says no. Five modes, one workflow each: prd (turn a spec or a user request into a build-ready PRD — objectives, in-scope, out-of-scope guards, an acceptance-criteria table mapping every success…
forge-behavior
Manage dotforge v3 behavior governance — view status, toggle behaviors, adjust strictness. Use when the user asks about active behaviors, wants to disable one for the current session, or adjust escalation thresholds.
earnings-watch
Quick post-earnings analysis for portfolio holdings. Beat/miss, key metrics, thesis impact, estimate revision. Triggers on "earnings update", "quarterly results", "Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 results", "post-earnings".
quick
Fast path — skip the full workflow for small tasks under 3 files.