Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add johnfkoo951/cmdspace-plugins --skill tddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/johnfkoo951/cmdspace-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnfkoo951/cmdspace-plugins/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnfkoo951/cmdspace-plugins/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnfkoo951/cmdspace-plugins/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/johnfkoo951/cmdspace-plugins/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/johnfkoo951/cmdspace-plugins/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.00548 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00219 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
TDD — Test-Driven Development
Enforces the Red-Green-Refactor cycle for quality-driven development.
Workflow
Step 1: Understand Requirements
Use AskUserQuestion:
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What are you building with TDD?",
"header": "Target",
"options": [
{"label": "New function/class", "description": "Build a new unit from scratch with tests first"},
{"label": "New feature", "description": "Build a feature across multiple files with test coverage"},
{"label": "Add tests to existing code", "description": "Write tests for code that already exists"},
{"label": "Fix bug with regression test", "description": "Write a test that reproduces the bug, then fix it"}
],
"multiSelect": false
}
]
}
Step 2: RED — Write Failing Tests
Dispatch tdd-guide (Haiku) to:
- Analyze the requirements
- Identify test scenarios (happy path, edge cases, error cases)
- Write the test file with all tests
- Verify tests fail (RED state)
Step 3: GREEN — Implement
Dispatch executor (Sonnet) with:
- The failing test file
- Requirement to make all tests pass
- Instruction to use the simplest possible implementation
- The existing codebase context for convention matching
After implementation, run tests via Bash to verify they pass.
Step 4: REFACTOR
If tests pass, dispatch code-reviewer (Sonnet) to:
- Review the implementation for quality
- Suggest refactoring opportunities
- Verify test quality (are tests testing the right things?)
Apply refactoring suggestions, re-run tests to confirm they still pass.
Step 5: Report
## TDD Cycle Complete
### Tests Written: [N]
- ✅ Happy path: [N] tests
- ✅ Edge cases: [N] tests
- ✅ Error cases: [N] tests
### Coverage: [N]% (if measurable)
### Implementation Files
- [file:line — what was implemented]
### Refactoring Applied
- [What was improved after tests passed]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 82 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A 687518688967
tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository johnfkoo951/cmdspace-plugins (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 548 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
auto-loop
TDD-based autonomous development loop with checkpoint recovery and observability changelog.
workflow
Run the complete 5-step development workflow: focus problem → prevent over-development → test-first (TDD) → document → smart commit. Use when starting a new feature, or when the user runs /workflow or asks for the full development flow.
test-first
Drive one feature through a strict TDD Red-Green-Refactor cycle with checklists for each phase. Use when implementing new functionality test-first, or when the user runs /test-first.
go-tdd
Implement a Go feature using TDD methodology with up-to-date library documentation from Context7.
agentic-engineering
Use when designing or refactoring a model-native engineering workflow with bounded autonomy, probes, custom evaluation, durable state, and verified write-back.
verify-before-claim
Use when an agent is about to claim completion, correctness, safety, publication, deployment, or any consequential external fact.